From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Support dynamically hideable system registers
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:57:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529593060-542-9-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529593060-542-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Some system registers may or may not logically exist for a vcpu
depending on whether certain architectural features are enabled for
the vcpu.
In order to avoid spuriously emulating access to these registers
when they should not exist, or allowing the registers to be
spuriously enumerated or saved/restored through the ioctl
interface, a means is needed to allow registers to be hidden
depending on the vcpu configuration.
In order to support this in a flexible way, this patch adds a
check_present() method to struct sys_reg_desc, and updates the
generic system register access and enumeration code to be aware of
it: if check_present() returns false, the code behaves as if the
register did not exist.
For convenience, the complete check is wrapped up in a new helper
sys_reg_present().
An attempt has been made to hook the new check into the generic
accessors for trapped system registers. This should reduce the
potential for future surprises, although the redundant check will
add a small cost. No system register depends on this functionality
yet, and some paths needing the check may also need attention.
Naturally, this facility makes sense only for registers that are
trapped.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index a436373..31a351a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
r = find_reg(params, table, num);
- if (r) {
+ if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
return 0;
}
@@ -2016,7 +2016,7 @@ static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!r)
r = find_reg(params, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
- if (likely(r)) {
+ if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
} else {
kvm_err("Unsupported guest sys_reg access at: %lx\n",
@@ -2313,6 +2313,9 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return get_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
+ if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+ return -ENOENT;
+
if (r->get_user)
return (r->get_user)(vcpu, r, reg, uaddr);
@@ -2334,6 +2337,9 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return set_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
+ if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+ return -ENOENT;
+
if (r->set_user)
return (r->set_user)(vcpu, r, reg, uaddr);
@@ -2390,7 +2396,8 @@ static bool copy_reg_to_user(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg, u64 __user **uind)
return true;
}
-static int walk_one_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
+static int walk_one_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
u64 __user **uind,
unsigned int *total)
{
@@ -2401,6 +2408,9 @@ static int walk_one_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
if (!(rd->reg || rd->get_user))
return 0;
+ if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, rd))
+ return 0;
+
if (!copy_reg_to_user(rd, uind))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -2429,9 +2439,9 @@ static int walk_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind)
int cmp = cmp_sys_reg(i1, i2);
/* target-specific overrides generic entry. */
if (cmp <= 0)
- err = walk_one_sys_reg(i1, &uind, &total);
+ err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i1, &uind, &total);
else
- err = walk_one_sys_reg(i2, &uind, &total);
+ err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i2, &uind, &total);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index cd710f8..dfbb342 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_SYS_REGS_LOCAL_H__
#define __ARM64_KVM_SYS_REGS_LOCAL_H__
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
struct sys_reg_params {
u8 Op0;
u8 Op1;
@@ -61,8 +64,16 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
int (*set_user)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
+ bool (*check_present)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vpcu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd);
};
+static inline bool sys_reg_present(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+ return likely(!rd->check_present) || rd->check_present(vcpu, rd);
+}
+
static inline void print_sys_reg_instr(const struct sys_reg_params *p)
{
/* Look, we even formatted it for you to paste into the table! */
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 14:57 [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:07 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:08 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/bitmap.h> to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm: Add arch init/uninit hooks Dave Martin
2018-07-06 10:02 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-09 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm64/sve: Determine virtualisation-friendly vector lengths Dave Martin
2018-07-06 13:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-07-25 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Support dynamically hideable system registers Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:36 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:53 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:46 ` Alex Bennée
2018-08-06 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:09 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 9:11 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 9:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 14:03 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-09 10:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:02 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:48 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:45 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:13 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:57 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:43 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via KVM_{GET, SET}_ONE_REG Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:58 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:55 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-27 9:26 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:04 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 17:20 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:10 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-08-03 15:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Report and enable SVE API extensions for userspace Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 15:27 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 16:52 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:18 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:30 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:24 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:23 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:14 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-06 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:18 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1529593060-542-9-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).