From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/7] add virt-dma support for imx-sdma
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:04:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530025442.9910.44.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529427424-12321-1-git-send-email-yibin.gong@nxp.com>
Hi Robin,
I've tested this whole series with the SDMA being used for SPI, UART
and SSI with no regressions spotted. As this should cover most common
use-cases, I think this series is good to go in.
Tested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Regards,
Lucas
Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2018, 00:56 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> The legacy sdma driver has below limitations or drawbacks:
> ? 1. Hardcode the max BDs number as "PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(*)", and alloc
> ?????one page size for one channel regardless of only few BDs needed
> ?????most time. But in few cases, the max PAGE_SIZE maybe not enough.
> ? 2. One SDMA channel can't stop immediatley once channel disabled which
> ?????means SDMA interrupt may come in after this channel terminated.There
> ?????are some patches for this corner case such as commit "2746e2c389f9",
> ?????but not cover non-cyclic.
>
> The common virt-dma overcomes the above limitations. It can alloc bd
> dynamically and free bd once this tx transfer done. No memory wasted or
> maximum limititation here, only depends on how many memory can be requested
> from kernel. For No.2, such issue can be workaround by checking if there
> is available descript("sdmac->desc") now once the unwanted interrupt
> coming. At last the common virt-dma is easier for sdma driver maintain.
>
> Change from v4:
> ? 1. identify lockdep issue which caused by allocate memory with
> ?????'GFP_KERNEL', change to 'GFP_NOWAIT' instead so that lockdep
> ?????ignore check. That also make sense since Audio/uart driver may
> ?????call dma function after spin_lock_irqsave()...
> ? 2. use dma pool instead for bd description allocated,since audio
> ?????driver may call dma_terminate_all in irq. Please refer to 7/7.
> ? 3. remove 7/7 serial patch in v4, since lockdep issued fixed by No.1?
>
> Change from v3:
> ? 1. add two uart patches which impacted by this patchset.
> ? 2. unlock 'vc.lock' before cyclic dma callback and lock again after
> ?????it because some driver such as uart will call dmaengine_tx_status
> ?????which will acquire 'vc.lock' again and dead lock comes out.
> ? 3. remove 'Revert commit' stuff since that patch is not wrong and
> ?????combine two patch into one patch as Sascha's comment.
>
> Change from v2:
> ? 1. include Sascha's patch to make the main patch easier to review.
> ?????Thanks Sacha.
> ? 2. remove useless 'desc'/'chan' in struct sdma_channe.
>
> Change from v1:
> ? 1. split v1 patch into 5 patches.
> ? 2. remove some unnecessary condition check.
> ? 3. remove unnecessary 'pending' list.
>
> Robin Gong (6):
> ? tty: serial: imx: correct dma cookie status
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: add virt-dma support
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove useless 'lock' and 'enabled' in 'struct
> ????sdma_channel'
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove the maximum limitation for bd numbers
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: add sdma_transfer_init to decrease code overlap
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: alloclate bd memory from dma pool
>
> Sascha Hauer (1):
> ? dmaengine: imx-sdma: factor out a struct sdma_desc from struct
> ????sdma_channel
>
> ?drivers/dma/Kconfig??????|???1 +
> ?drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c???| 400 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> ?drivers/tty/serial/imx.c |???2 +-
> ?3 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 16:56 [PATCH v5 0/7] add virt-dma support for imx-sdma Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] tty: serial: imx: correct dma cookie status Robin Gong
2018-06-26 19:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-06-29 11:03 ` Vinod
2018-06-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: factor out a struct sdma_desc from struct sdma_channel Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: add virt-dma support Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove useless 'lock' and 'enabled' in 'struct sdma_channel' Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove the maximum limitation for bd numbers Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: add sdma_transfer_init to decrease code overlap Robin Gong
2018-06-19 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] dmaengine: imx-sdma: alloclate bd memory from dma pool Robin Gong
2018-08-06 12:44 ` Lucas Stach
2018-06-22 1:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] add virt-dma support for imx-sdma Robin Gong
2018-06-22 6:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-06-26 15:04 ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2018-06-27 1:18 ` Robin Gong
2018-07-02 2:32 ` Robin Gong
2018-07-02 13:17 ` Vinod
2018-07-03 2:57 ` Robin Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530025442.9910.44.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).