From: chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com (Chunfeng Yun)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:12:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1535591523.32173.32.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829083050.GG28861@localhost>
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 10:30 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:10:48AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() because devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
> > never return NULL value;
> > But still need ignore the error of -ENODEV, for more information, please
> > refer to:
> > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/19/88
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10160181/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > V2: keep the -ENODEV check
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/core/phy.c | 11 ++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > index 9879767..e3cc743 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > @@ -23,14 +23,11 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> > struct list_head *list)
> > {
> > struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> > - struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> > + struct phy *phy;
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> > - if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> > - return 0;
> > - else
> > - return PTR_ERR(phy);
> > - }
> > + phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> > + if (IS_ERR(phy))
> > + return (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV) ? 0 : PTR_ERR(phy);
>
> I prefer not to use the terse ternary operator in general, and
> especially so in this case where we are doing something unexpected (i.e.
> we want to highlight that the -ENODEV case is special).
>
> So please keep the current construct, and just replace IS_ERR_OR_NULL
> and drop the !phy test.
>
> I think separating the declaration and (non-trivial) initialisation of
> phy here is a good thing that can remain in the patch, even if it's
> arguable separate change.
>
Ok, thanks
> >
> > roothub_entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*roothub_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!roothub_entry)
>
> Thanks,
> Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 2:10 [PATCH v2] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index() Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-29 8:30 ` Johan Hovold
2018-08-30 1:12 ` Chunfeng Yun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1535591523.32173.32.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox