Re: [PATCH v5 09/20] iommu/mediatek: Refine protect memory definition

Evan Green
2019-01-30T18:56:32Z

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:58 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> The protect memory setting is a little different in the different SoCs.
> In the register REG_MMU_CTRL_REG(0x110), the TF_PROT(translation fault
> protect) shift bit is normally 4 while it shift 5 bits only in the
> mt8173. This patch delete the complex MACRO and use a common if-else
> instead.
>
> Also, use "F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR" instead of the hard code(2)
> which means the M4U will output the dirty data to the programmed
> address that we allocated dynamically when translation fault occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> @Nicalos, I don't put it in the plat_data since only the previous mt8173
> shift 5. As I know, the latest SoC always use the new setting like mt2712
> and mt8183. Thus, I think it is unnecessary to put it in plat_data and
> let all the latest SoC set it. Hence, I still keep "== mt8173" for this
> like the reg REG_MMU_CTRL_REG.
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index eca1536..35a1263 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -53,11 +53,7 @@
>
> #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG 0x110
> #define F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD BIT(4)
> -#define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data) \
> - ((data)->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT2712 ? 4 : 5)
> -/* It's named by F_MMU_TF_PROT_SEL in mt2712. */
> -#define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(prot, data) \
> - (((prot) & 0x3) << F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data))
> +#define F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR 2
>
> #define REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR 0x114
>
> @@ -521,9 +517,11 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - regval = F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(2, data);
> if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
> - regval |= F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD;
> + regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
> + (F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR << 5);
> + else
> + regval = F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR << 4;

I agree with Nicolas with regard to not having the random 4 and 5
sprinkled in the function.
-Evan