From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D087CC169C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A8C20B1F for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="RtOdv9RI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A9A8C20B1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rgQzh6l5mPGjZnp4DDh/KtyzuOic1+SrUJ3sl6i68vQ=; b=RtOdv9RIDcvWML PoLT+89nYbOhmkmQ5LLxmGJwKkKkvAemodsypWjQlRHHB2ruKI6LZMXOvbsbke5Ox0CvaR20AsUn3 yL+iue0yxWcd2YPyAO+x5Ylm5LtHe3fRH6jU06MhJMOyrM/0ENzpV5xhvUgnzrCFJ1YGzK+4ERagk Ban+IOzRJQGS+fO+EP5KG4nBJ0D+ukiU0p/BUrFQL//uOOdT4Mc7pTgyZrYNzfXioYmyRW/K4aoeQ wKMwgSB2zGpOYCZL6JGQ/2eh5hMNWRan4rDcFOv3RSW6RT8o3Ro5v0+oKCxN1rx3AKog4o5tEr19/ 1FZ09XEB3qreB75/Rv8A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gp8Vk-0002po-8q; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:19:52 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gp8Ve-0002oy-3v; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:19:50 +0000 X-UUID: 4b69695eaba148c5843de74f5ce7d2fa-20190131 X-UUID: 4b69695eaba148c5843de74f5ce7d2fa-20190131 Received: from mtkcas68.mediatek.inc [(172.29.94.19)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 200268427; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 01:19:37 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 01:19:34 -0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:19:27 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:19:27 +0800 Message-ID: <1548926367.4980.14.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [v1] PCI: mediatek: Remove MSI inner domain From: Honghui Zhang To: Jianjun Wang Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:19:27 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1548149855-3225-1-git-send-email-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> References: <1548149855-3225-1-git-send-email-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190131_011948_653071_12FBE81C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Marc Zyngier , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 17:37 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote: > There is no need to create the inner domain as a parent for MSI domian, > some feature has been implemented by MSI framework. > > Remove the inner domain and its irq chip, it will be more closer to > hardware implementation. > Hi, jianjun, I'm not quite familiar with the irq_chip framework, It was under Marc's great help with the first version of irq_chip solution code. I would like you to add him for the review. Thanks. > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 86 +++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > index 8d05df56158b..f996a9a6331f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc { > * @slot: port slot > * @irq: GIC irq > * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain > - * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain > * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain > * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap > * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ > @@ -190,7 +189,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port { > u32 slot; > int irq; > struct irq_domain *irq_domain; > - struct irq_domain *inner_domain; > struct irq_domain *msi_domain; > struct mutex lock; > DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); > @@ -418,22 +416,15 @@ static void mtk_msi_ack_irq(struct irq_data *data) > u32 hwirq = data->hwirq; > > writel(1 << hwirq, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS); > + writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); > } > > -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { > - .name = "MTK MSI", > - .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg, > - .irq_set_affinity = mtk_msi_set_affinity, > - .irq_ack = mtk_msi_ack_irq, > -}; > - > -static int mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, > - unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args) > +static irq_hw_number_t mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq(struct msi_domain_info *info, > + msi_alloc_info_t *arg) > { > - struct mtk_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data; > - unsigned long bit; > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = info->chip_data; > + irq_hw_number_t bit; > > - WARN_ON(nr_irqs != 1); > mutex_lock(&port->lock); > > bit = find_first_zero_bit(port->msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); > @@ -446,18 +437,14 @@ static int mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int vir > > mutex_unlock(&port->lock); > > - irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip, > - domain->host_data, handle_edge_irq, > - NULL, NULL); > - > - return 0; > + return bit; > } > > -static void mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, > - unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs) > +static void mtk_pcie_msi_free(struct irq_domain *domain, > + struct msi_domain_info *info, unsigned int virq) > { > struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq); > - struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = info->chip_data; > > mutex_lock(&port->lock); > > @@ -468,46 +455,50 @@ static void mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, > __clear_bit(d->hwirq, port->msi_irq_in_use); > > mutex_unlock(&port->lock); > - > - irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs); > } > > -static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = { > - .alloc = mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc, > - .free = mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free, > +static struct msi_domain_ops mtk_msi_domain_ops = { > + .get_hwirq = mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq, > + .msi_free = mtk_pcie_msi_free, > }; > > static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { > - .name = "MTK PCIe MSI", > - .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, > - .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > - .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > + .name = "MTK PCIe", > + .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg, > + .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg, > + .irq_set_affinity = mtk_msi_set_affinity, > + .irq_ack = mtk_msi_ack_irq, > + .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > + .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > }; > > static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = { > - .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | > - MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > - .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | > + MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > + .ops = &mtk_msi_domain_ops, > + .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > + .handler = handle_edge_irq, > + .handler_name = "MSI", > }; > > static int mtk_pcie_allocate_msi_domains(struct mtk_pcie_port *port) > { > - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(port->pcie->dev->of_node); > + struct device *dev = port->pcie->dev; > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(dev->of_node); > + struct msi_domain_info *info; > > mutex_init(&port->lock); > > - port->inner_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM, > - &msi_domain_ops, port); > - if (!port->inner_domain) { > - dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n"); > + info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!info) > return -ENOMEM; > - } > > - port->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &mtk_msi_domain_info, > - port->inner_domain); > + memcpy(info, &mtk_msi_domain_info, sizeof(*info)); > + info->chip_data = port; > + I'm not really like this memcpy of msi_domain_info, but I do not have a better idea to prevent the mixed of mtk_pcie_port data. > + port->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, info, NULL); > if (!port->msi_domain) { > - dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n"); > - irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain); > + dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > } > > @@ -541,8 +532,6 @@ static void mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(struct mtk_pcie *pcie) > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { > if (port->msi_domain) > irq_domain_remove(port->msi_domain); > - if (port->inner_domain) > - irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain); > } > > irq_dispose_mapping(port->irq); > @@ -619,12 +608,11 @@ static void mtk_pcie_intr_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > > while ((imsi_status = readl(port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS))) { > for_each_set_bit(bit, &imsi_status, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) { > - virq = irq_find_mapping(port->inner_domain, bit); > + virq = irq_find_mapping( > + port->msi_domain, bit); > generic_handle_irq(virq); > } > } > - /* Clear MSI interrupt status */ > - writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); > } why change this irq status clear flow? > } > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel