From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: arm/arm64: add support for chained counters
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:47:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550497684-26046-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw)
ARMv8 provides support for chained PMU counters, where an event type
of 0x001E is set for odd-numbered counters, the event counter will
increment by one for each overflow of the preceding even-numbered
counter. Let's emulate this in KVM by creating a 64 bit perf counter
when a user chains two emulated counters together.
Testing has been performed by hard-coding hwc->sample_period in
__hw_perf_event_init (arm_pmu.c) to a small value, this results in
regular overflows (for non sampling events). The following command
was then used to measure chained and non-chained instruction cycles:
perf stat -e armv8_pmuv3/long=1,inst_retired/u \
-e armv8_pmuv3/long=0,inst_retired/u dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M \
count=10 | gzip > /dev/null
The reported values were identical (and for non-chained was in the
same ballpark when running on a kernel without this patchset). Debug
was added to verify that the guest received overflow interrupts for
the chain counter.
Changes since v2:
- Rebased onto v5.0-rc7
- Add check for cycle counter in correct patch
- Minor style, naming and comment changes
- Extract armv8pmu_evtype_is_chain from arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
into a common header that KVM can use
Changes since v1:
- Rename kvm_pmu_{enable,disable}_counter to reflect that they can
operate on multiple counters at once and use these functions where
possible
- Fix bugs with overflow handing, kvm_pmu_get_counter_value did not
take into consideration the perf counter value overflowing the low
counter
- Ensure PMCCFILTR_EL0 is used when operating on the cycle counter
- Rename kvm_pmu_reenable_enabled_{pair, single} and similar
- Always create perf event disabled to simplify logic elsewhere
- Move PMCNTENSET_EL0 test to kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask
Andrew Murray (6):
KVM: arm/arm64: rename kvm_pmu_{enable/disable}_counter functions
KVM: arm/arm64: extract duplicated code to own function
KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value
KVM: arm/arm64: lazily create perf events on enable
arm64: perf: extract chain helper into header
KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters
arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 5 +
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 +-
include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 9 +-
virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 410 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-18 13:47 Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-02-18 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: arm/arm64: rename kvm_pmu_{enable/disable}_counter functions Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: arm/arm64: extract duplicated code to own function Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: arm/arm64: lazily create perf events on enable Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: perf: extract chain helper into header Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters Andrew Murray
2019-02-20 13:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-20 19:34 ` Andrew Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1550497684-26046-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com \
--to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).