From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402ABC43381 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0870B2089F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="vDwJAB2g" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0870B2089F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uuRmJ6N03Va9zhOs9li/MXA9J/DRr9hrCr3yQJrOYoY=; b=vDwJAB2gT2/tyq 55Cyqd0rriwOotJC3S6Hb6yI8GsgfjSVXVy1+YY8Hq2q/rE4LBf3lQ0fV3dPA5qq3Y8/KO5L+JoGo hzOL2WNrvyMw869Xpaibllf65sI3/etu6gUaW4lZJU3IzqsOCsuz8JsxFCqM7JIcE14VAf1foxoxp QC29Nd6MBbvOVJTft7FTSQA2y/+fPplmlhW8d68yM1R4Ujk2FH6hj5iCW3pkqymyac8RP1Dq3tOiP 2w0UWr+WO5oaVqNe8gk/dkcqHs313MDhulKGvd4/KCbr8c43CetreGsI9usejfrVdl2E/Is+YsB7U xrhGGdsYeJhSGDL2MPZg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gw5Dv-00017K-4T; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:14:11 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gw5Dn-000142-8V; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:14:09 +0000 X-UUID: e87b24847471454f846a4d9622741b63-20190219 X-UUID: e87b24847471454f846a4d9622741b63-20190219 Received: from mtkcas68.mediatek.inc [(172.29.94.19)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 791939977; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 05:13:47 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 05:13:46 -0800 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:13:43 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:13:43 +0800 Message-ID: <1550582023.30065.52.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT8183 i2c binding From: Qii Wang To: Wolfram Sang Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:13:43 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20190216122915.hchghozcn7ntdkbm@ninjato> References: <1548057574-8061-1-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <1548057574-8061-6-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <20190205131641.GF12401@kunai> <1550109268.30065.13.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20190215090257.geumssb2cucs7rzt@ninjato> <1550316723.30065.44.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20190216122915.hchghozcn7ntdkbm@ninjato> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190219_051403_305530_E3EC81C5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Rob Herring , leilk.liu@mediatek.com, xinping.qian@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liguo.zhang@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2019-02-16 at 13:29 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Maybe you think that MT8183 SoC only has the I3C controllers. Actually, > > there are I2C and I3C controllers on MT8183 SoC. We will remove > > "mediatek,share-i3c" for I2C controller driver, so these patches are > > just to support the I2C controllers on MT8183 SoC. For the I3C > > controller we will send some new patches which are based on i3c > > framework directories(kernel/drivers/i3c), not based on > > i2c-mt65xx.c. > > Sounds perfect to me. If it turns out that the I3C driver can share > things with the I2C driver, we can discuss it then. But unless we have > an I3C driver and know for sure, the above strategy seems good to me. > Can I push the V4 patches of I2C controller driver now? or you just want an I3C driver that is compatible with the I2C controller? According to our plan, I2C controller will use i2c-mt65xx.c(kernel/drivers/i2c/busses/)and I3C controller will use i3c-xxx.c(kernel/drivers/i3c/master/) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel