From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 342740659.2887.1549307721609.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com,
Robert.Berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
labbott@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
patches@armlinux.org.uk, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
wcohen@redhat.com
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "ARM: 8834/1: Fix: kprobes: optimized kprobes illegal instruction" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:41:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155091846165181@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARM: 8834/1: Fix: kprobes: optimized kprobes illegal instruction
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm-8834-1-fix-kprobes-optimized-kprobes-illegal-instruction.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From 0ac569bf6a7983c0c5747d6df8db9dc05bc92b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:37:40 +0100
Subject: ARM: 8834/1: Fix: kprobes: optimized kprobes illegal instruction
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
commit 0ac569bf6a7983c0c5747d6df8db9dc05bc92b6c upstream.
commit e46daee53bb5 ("ARM: 8806/1: kprobes: Fix false positive with
FORTIFY_SOURCE") introduced a regression in optimized kprobes. It
triggers "invalid instruction" oopses when using kprobes instrumentation
through lttng and perf. This commit was introduced in kernel v4.20, and
has been backported to stable kernels 4.19 and 4.14.
This crash was also reported by Hongzhi Song on the redhat bugzilla
where the patch was originally introduced.
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639397
Link: https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1174
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/342740659.2887.1549307721609.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com
Fixes: e46daee53bb5 ("ARM: 8806/1: kprobes: Fix false positive with FORTIFY_SOURCE")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reported-by: Robert Berger <Robert.Berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com>
Tested-by: Robert Berger <Robert.Berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Robert Berger <Robert.Berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: patches@armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct
}
/* Copy arch-dep-instance from template. */
- memcpy(code, (unsigned char *)optprobe_template_entry,
+ memcpy(code, (unsigned long *)&optprobe_template_entry,
TMPL_END_IDX * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
/* Adjust buffer according to instruction. */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com are
queue-4.14/arm-8834-1-fix-kprobes-optimized-kprobes-illegal-instruction.patch
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
reply other threads:[~2019-02-23 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155091846165181@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=342740659.2887.1549307721609.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--cc=Robert.Berger@ReliableEmbeddedSystems.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).