From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875ABC43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CCE20651 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fTjlyDyU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56CCE20651 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=28m05XSvLr6n9/0L4PPD2p6yNLhX6lf6GBixqIHfJIE=; b=fTjlyDyU0LpC7K0/Q9OMRq3wwA 3GkH3vkN8V1ubPnljVV/eJ7kkzII/ef8JKfCFeMA5bpwDOGS0vfIb1SMrQrnTSetsMhhF9bPeD5yn uMBlcKQ/wbqp1BER52zuyWq/oRf331t5Ad3Kg3L2f3gYj0DhKO/IE//NoCZm1kVKBQz1xrzw07DPF BHFpW9Rf3b6plnXWP2+3TbelaT0ugwzuZAdk7vrutFpeb4ZmR3J+ELjDJ4r42jm3SBsE9lj8imHGl mVYMlZRlCJ65O/sUA7dCfdg/4MlG70c9/C/U+W9fYoABBF5Zk7yEMa5pbR9b2/O/c2glTsHFIwqQV uiIhGutQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h6IzV-0005jy-HB; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:57:33 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h6Ivn-0001Ka-A4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:53:51 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BA6168F; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 263A43F614; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:53:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Martin To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [PATCH v6 17/27] KVM: arm64: Reject ioctl access to FPSIMD V-regs on SVE vcpus Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:52:08 +0000 Message-Id: <1553017938-710-18-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1553017938-710-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> References: <1553017938-710-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190319_105343_946367_27C9CB1E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Okamoto Takayuki , Christoffer Dall , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Zhang Lei , Julien Grall , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In order to avoid the pointless complexity of maintaining two ioctl register access views of the same data, this patch blocks ioctl access to the FPSIMD V-registers on vcpus that support SVE. This will make it more straightforward to add SVE register access support. Since SVE is an opt-in feature for userspace, this will not affect existing users. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- (Julien Thierry's Reviewed-by dropped due to non-trivial refactoring) Changes since v5: * Refactored to cope with the removal of core_reg_size_from_offset() (which was added by another series which will now be handled independently). This leaves some duplication in that we still filter the V-regs out in two places, but this no worse than other existing code in guest.c. I plan to tidy this up independently later on. --- arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index a391a61..756d0d6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c @@ -54,12 +54,19 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } +static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off) +{ + return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) && + off < KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr); +} + static u64 core_reg_offset_from_id(u64 id) { return id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE); } -static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) +static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(reg->id); int size; @@ -91,11 +98,19 @@ static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) return -EINVAL; } - if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) == size && - IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32))) - return 0; + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != size || + !IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32))) + return -EINVAL; - return -EINVAL; + /* + * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of + * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on + * SVE-enabled vcpus: + */ + if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(off)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; } static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) @@ -117,7 +132,7 @@ static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; - if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + if (validate_core_offset(vcpu, reg)) return -EINVAL; if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ((u32 *)regs) + off, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) @@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; - if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + if (validate_core_offset(vcpu, reg)) return -EINVAL; if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp)) @@ -195,13 +210,22 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) return -EINVAL; } -static int kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user *uindices) +static int copy_core_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + u64 __user *uindices) { unsigned int i; int n = 0; const u64 core_reg = KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE; for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32); i++) { + /* + * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of + * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on + * SVE-enabled vcpus: + */ + if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(i)) + continue; + if (uindices) { if (put_user(core_reg | i, uindices)) return -EFAULT; @@ -214,9 +238,9 @@ static int kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user *uindices) return n; } -static unsigned long num_core_regs(void) +static unsigned long num_core_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(NULL); + return copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL); } /** @@ -281,7 +305,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long res = 0; - res += num_core_regs(); + res += num_core_regs(vcpu); res += kvm_arm_num_sys_reg_descs(vcpu); res += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu); res += NUM_TIMER_REGS; @@ -298,7 +322,7 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices) { int ret; - ret = kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(uindices); + ret = copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices); if (ret) return ret; uindices += ret; -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel