linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, james.morse@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, liwei391@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:00:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556553607-46531-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> (raw)

Hi,

[Changing the title to make it reflex more the status of the series.]

Version one[1] of this series attempted to fix the issue reported by
Zenghui[2] when using the function_graph tracer with IRQ priority
masking.

Since then, I realized that priority masking and the use of Pseudo-NMIs
was more broken than I thought.

* Patch 1 is just some rework
* Patch 2 replaces the previous irqflags tracing "simplification" with
  a proper fix when tracing Pseudo-NMI
* Patch 3 fixes the function_graph issue when using priority masking
* Patch 4 introduces some debug to hopefully avoid breaking things in
  the future
* Patch 5 is a rebased version of the patch sent by Wei Li[3] fixing
  an error that can happen during on some platform using the priority
  masking feature

Changes since V1 [1]:
- Fix possible race condition between NMI and trace irqflags
- Simplify the representation of PSR.I in the PMR value
- Include Wei Li's fix
- Rebase on v5.1-rc7

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=155542458004480&w=2
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html
[3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg722171.html

Cheers,

Julien

-->

Julien Thierry (4):
  arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit
  arm64: Fix interrupt tracing in the presence of NMIs
  arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking
  arm64: irqflags: Introduce explicit debugging for IRQ priorities

Wei Li (1):
  arm64: fix kernel stack overflow in kdump capture kernel

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                  | 11 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h  |  9 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h  | 31 +++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h   | 83 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h     | 10 ++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S           | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c             | 26 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c             |  6 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c         |  2 +-
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c        |  6 +++
 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c                |  8 +++-
 14 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-29 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-29 16:00 Julien Thierry [this message]
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: Fix interrupt tracing in the presence of NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-05-07  8:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-14  9:25     ` Julien Thierry
2019-05-14 12:01       ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-14 13:08         ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: irqflags: Introduce explicit debugging for IRQ priorities Julien Thierry
2019-05-07  8:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-16 13:43     ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: fix kernel stack overflow in kdump capture kernel Julien Thierry
2019-05-23 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes Will Deacon
2019-06-05 16:07   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1556553607-46531-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).