From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C22C31E40 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829D22085A for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="mTYeo/a8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="X5g0JAvd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 829D22085A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: References:To:Subject:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Eun22Oaiigkm6xVwpknjV1t/kQ9kUtEa/g+LBXQgkjg=; b=mTYeo/a8W9vqT6 hBPUkkLqTXBllDY8FWYGrsUAd30kFp6QoFoVtMWdmcynVWxNGL4qx4m3P7TECM9aKmsQzT/Q54hwY 60puNHZVtFFE8XtcTD1KSAuQRP4o+CVxD/KIa+mQgFb5Xrim50MyLk85qyj/Glo0907f+Cguj17RL H6/1F8k3J8/6usOTlxzW5WkAlyeIROoRSdbxK4Ph2opvmfG5QGx4+zB3FjJatTmyuWD6OuWkrrDm6 YQdcL0ZhRaxV3Ggg+0vvpjQELyMPXWcj3cE2I9vPqKae2Og7kYcgRU7R3zSEouKCLUUjr8FXrS2XJ Av2vv0Bv/FmN99c9oM7w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1haLZv-0001V1-VE; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:47:19 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1haLZs-0001Ts-Mx for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:47:17 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id e5so3744449pls.13 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wq53+njaY8Nizg87bnJv9I6awFz838NRdQghS0a7fkM=; b=X5g0JAvdV1k6T8yY6ZUvrcraWM4yMrG/lxJCK+nAqRLcZyfzQtXY4ZbYz6fOYHWy3n Ou8dcJ4J6pIL1UEocGoC4sPgamfUWIHesWmZ8UX6rEWSdzt9ISIcx9cBiIgBO1pLSbDQ bhOBx/V93amqxNh29DiYEna/vlDWwPNSH0HP8kuGzL0W2dnDnjJk1o+mR2xDI146xllb CGKw3KHTmadPXuq8gLrXsXWVk8oNjiQOOuOZXkERDlgP23OsxNnnrUkyJ5sqo3VO0K3v NviZJEwFJwnWh80oqJu8/n12fYX46vxiYKwSmmxCyHZAabHAJNThB0WoxME22CohL67N 7IJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wq53+njaY8Nizg87bnJv9I6awFz838NRdQghS0a7fkM=; b=FaO7vam7XEjY/rsARYEQ4HqhGep0saFupnA00UmmSsb5sOgRElYO/V/iODfuCWRpho mAQy50w9qMe++CTM/0+Xzl/KwYoFi0ZqXrsbtK1G+WAMUeQMwpS1OVIfPpQ5YRhTWk7h tmQZo+/CsI4P4F2DYBQdC7P1wVGj+6f+xqDHem2pez2ipD+KmKKP+4EBisntlX8Lrv4U G0pwn+LsgtCkTGLiaL0CkZNk+Xq+fe2snFA73B/0rbuhKRmpm1N222gEpKwoewtiDGBI xsE3qLc1iVUHHvpwrXv+pok0vCHnSzRTdc/nYRH7zOffy9LE18kJmIiziUS2QBvExYrG cCcg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXo3Je0XoY4Co3EuDIOumnfCkZ9gBe4UZLS24WqcLPUqriOj83I jeetvKKfLJ+a9UlQtB0LsBVfeTOa X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzO+K5a5izxxRmZJDOMMeEKbiwUXCm3sWfTX0ai2WfHFHXOFTxBzy4ayjR/yFM/5mp8uqkfJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f81:: with SMTP id z1mr4934200plo.290.1560178036097; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (60-241-56-246.tpgi.com.au. [60.241.56.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p68sm4145337pfb.80.2019.06.10.07.47.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:44:49 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmalloc: Hugepage vmalloc mappings To: Mark Rutland References: <20190610043838.27916-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20190610043838.27916-4-npiggin@gmail.com> <20190610141036.GA16989@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190610141036.GA16989@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.14.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1560177786.t6c5cn5hw4.astroid@bobo.none> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190610_074716_778096_CE51A658 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.46 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Mark Rutland's on June 11, 2019 12:10 am: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:38:38PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> For platforms that define HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP, have vmap allow vmalloc to >> allocate huge pages and map them >> >> This brings dTLB misses for linux kernel tree `git diff` from 45,000 to >> 8,000 on a Kaby Lake KVM guest with 8MB dentry hash and mitigations=off >> (performance is in the noise, under 1% difference, page tables are likely >> to be well cached for this workload). Similar numbers are seen on POWER9. > > Do you happen to know which vmalloc mappings these get used for in the > above case? Where do we see vmalloc mappings that large? Large module vmalloc could be subject to huge mappings. > I'm worried as to how this would interact with the set_memory_*() > functions, as on arm64 those can only operate on page-granular mappings. > Those may need fixing up to handle huge mappings; certainly if the above > is all for modules. Good point, that looks like it would break on arm64 at least. I'll work on it. We may have to make this opt in beyond HUGE_VMAP. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel