From: Jungo Lin <jungo.lin@mediatek.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Sean Cheng (鄭昇弘)" <sean.cheng@mediatek.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Rynn Wu (吳育恩)" <rynn.wu@mediatek.com>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Ryan Yu (余孟修)" <ryan.yu@mediatek.com>,
"Frankie Chiu (邱文凱)" <frankie.chiu@mediatek.com>,
"Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Sj Huang" <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
ddavenport@chromium.org,
"Frederic Chen (陳俊元)" <frederic.chen@mediatek.com>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC,v3 9/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 shared memory device
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 13:44:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562305471.1212.58.camel@mtksdccf07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAFQd5BaTQ-Q7gsE0X+d4_81OZq9WHaCYkmALt7_4A1JFo=_8g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Tomasz:
On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 13:22 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Jungo,
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:33 PM Jungo Lin <jungo.lin@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 16:25 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Jungo,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:53:44AM +0800, Jungo Lin wrote:
> > > > The purpose of this child device is to provide shared
> > > > memory management for exchanging tuning data between co-processor
> > > > and the Pass 1 unit of the camera ISP system, including cache
> > > > buffer handling.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looks like we haven't really progressed on getting this replaced with
> > > something that doesn't require so much custom code. Let me propose something
> > > better then.
> > >
> > > We already have a reserved memory mode in DT. If it has a compatible string
> > > of "shared-dma-pool", it would be registered in the coherent DMA framework
> > > [1]. That would make it available for consumer devices to look-up.
> > >
> > > Now if we add a "memory-region" property to the SCP device node and point it
> > > to our reserved memory node, the SCP driver could look it up and hook to the
> > > DMA mapping API using of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx[2].
> > >
> > > That basically makes any dma_alloc_*(), dma_map_*(), etc. calls on the SCP
> > > struct device use the coherent DMA ops, which operate on the assigned memory
> > > pool. With that, the P1 driver could just directly use those calls to
> > > manage the memory, without any custom code.
> > >
> > > There is an example how this setup works in the s5p-mfc driver[3], but it
> > > needs to be noted that it creates child nodes, because it can have more than
> > > 1 DMA port, which may need its own memory pool. In our case, we wouldn't
> > > need child nodes and could just use the SCP device directly.
> > >
> > > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2-rc7/source/kernel/dma/coherent.c#L345
> > > [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2-rc7/source/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c#L312
> > > [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2-rc7/source/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c#L1075
> > >
> > > Let me also post some specific comments below, in case we end up still
> > > needing any of the code.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks your suggestions.
> >
> > After applying your suggestion in SCP device driver, we could remove
> > mtk_cam-smem.h/c. Currently, we use dma_alloc_coherent with SCP device
> > to get SCP address. We could touch the buffer with this SCP address in
> > SCP processor.
> >
> > After that, we use dma_map_page_attrs with P1 device which supports
> > IOMMU domain to get IOVA address. For this address, we will assign
> > it to our ISP HW device to proceed.
> >
> > Below is the snippet for ISP P1 compose buffer initialization.
> >
> > ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(p1_dev->cam_dev.smem_dev,
> > MAX_COMPOSER_SIZE, &addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!ptr) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate compose memory\n");
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> > isp_ctx->scp_mem_pa = addr;
>
> addr contains a DMA address, not a physical address. Could we call it
> scp_mem_dma instead?
>
Ok, we will rename this.
> > dev_dbg(dev, "scp addr:%pad\n", &addr);
> >
> > /* get iova address */
> > addr = dma_map_page_attrs(dev, phys_to_page(addr), 0,
>
> addr is a DMA address, so phys_to_page() can't be called on it. The
> simplest thing here would be to use dma_map_single() with ptr as the
> CPU address expected.
>
Got it. We will revise to use dma_map_single() with ptr.
> > MAX_COMPOSER_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
> > DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> > if (dma_mapping_error(dev, addr)) {
> > isp_ctx->scp_mem_pa = 0;
>
> We also need to free the allocated memory.
>
Ok, we will add the dma_unmap_single to free the allocated memory.
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to map scp iova\n");
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> > isp_ctx->scp_mem_iova = addr;
> >
> > Moreover, we have another meta input buffer usage.
> > For this kind of buffer, it will be allocated by V4L2 framework
> > with dma_alloc_coherent with SCP device. In order to get IOVA,
> > we will add dma_map_page_attrs in vb2_ops' buf_init function.
> > In buf_cleanup function, we will call dma_unmap_page_attrs function.
>
> As per above, we don't have access to the struct page we want to map.
> We probably want to get the CPU VA using vb2_plane_vaddr() and call
> dma_map_single() instead.
>
Got it. We will revise this to use dma_map_single() with CPU VA which is
got from vb2_plane_vaddr() function.
> >
> > Based on these current implementation, do you think it is correct?
> > If we got any wrong, please let us know.
> >
> > Btw, we also DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING DMA attribte to
> > avoid dma_sync_sg_for_device. Othewise, it will hit the KE.
> > Maybe we could not get the correct sg_table.
> > Do you think it is a bug and need to fix?
>
> I think DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is good to have for all the buffers
> that don't need to be accessed from the kernel anyway, to avoid
> unnecessary kernel mapping operations. However, for coherent memory
> pool, it doesn't change anything, because the memory always has a
> kernel mapping. We also need the kernel virtual address for
> dma_map_single(). Also the flag doesn't eliminate the need to do the
> sync, e.g. if the userspace accesses the buffer.
>
> Could you give me more information about the failure you're seeing?
> Where is the dma_sync_sg_for_device() called from? Where do you get
> the sgtable from?
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
Sorry. I forgot provide one information related to this issue.
Here is the call stack of panic KE if we enable DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT
DMA flag. Maybe we should not enable this flag for coherent memory pool.
[Function]
vb2_dc_alloc
[Code]
if (!(buf->attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING) &&
(buf->attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT))
buf->dma_sgt = vb2_dc_get_base_sgt(buf);
[KE]
[ 59.234326] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
[ 59.234935] pc : __clean_dcache_area_poc+0x20/0x38
[ 59.235537] lr : __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device+0x74/0x9c
[ 59.249430] Call trace:
[ 59.249742] __clean_dcache_area_poc+0x20/0x38
[ 59.250303] vb2_dc_prepare+0x5c/0x6c
[ 59.250763] __buf_prepare+0x790/0x8a4
[ 59.251234] vb2_req_prepare+0x38/0x68
[ 59.251707] vb2_request_validate+0x40/0x9c
[ 59.252235] media_request_ioctl+0x124/0x2a4
[ 59.252774] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0xf4/0x25c
[ 59.253356] el0_svc_common+0xa4/0x154
[ 59.253828] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x38
[ 59.254377] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
[ 59.254827] Code: 9ac32042 8b010001 d1000443 8a230000 (d50b7a20)
[ 59.255592] ---[ end trace eb37ebade032c2fc ]---
[ 59.256173] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Thanks,
Jungo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-05 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 3:53 [RFC, V3 0/9] media: platform: mtk-isp: Add Mediatek ISP Pass 1 driver Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 1/9] dt-bindings: mt8183: Added camera ISP Pass 1 Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 2/9] dts: arm64: mt8183: Add ISP Pass 1 nodes Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 3/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP Pass 1 driver Kconfig Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC, v3 4/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 image & meta formats Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 5/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 V4L2 control Jungo Lin
2019-07-01 5:50 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-02 11:34 ` Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 6/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 V4L2 functions Jungo Lin
2019-07-10 9:54 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-18 4:39 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-23 10:21 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-24 4:31 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-26 5:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-29 1:18 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-29 10:04 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-30 1:44 ` Jungo Lin
2019-08-05 9:59 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 7/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 device driver Jungo Lin
2019-07-10 9:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-20 9:58 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-25 9:23 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-26 7:23 ` Jungo Lin
2019-08-06 9:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-08-07 2:11 ` Jungo Lin
2019-08-07 13:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC,v3 8/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 SCP communication Jungo Lin
2019-07-10 9:58 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-21 2:18 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-25 10:56 ` [RFC, v3 " Tomasz Figa
2019-07-26 8:07 ` [RFC,v3 " Jungo Lin
2019-06-11 3:53 ` [RFC, v3 9/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 shared memory device Jungo Lin
2019-07-01 7:25 ` [RFC,v3 " Tomasz Figa
2019-07-05 3:33 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-05 4:22 ` [RFC, v3 " Tomasz Figa
2019-07-05 5:44 ` Jungo Lin [this message]
2019-07-05 7:59 ` [RFC,v3 " Jungo Lin
2019-07-23 7:20 ` [RFC, v3 " Tomasz Figa
2019-07-23 8:21 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-26 5:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-26 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-26 7:42 ` Tomasz Figa
2019-07-26 11:04 ` Robin Murphy
2019-07-26 11:59 ` Jungo Lin
2019-07-26 14:04 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1562305471.1212.58.camel@mtksdccf07 \
--to=jungo.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=ddavenport@chromium.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frankie.chiu@mediatek.com \
--cc=frederic.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.yu@mediatek.com \
--cc=rynn.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sean.cheng@mediatek.com \
--cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).