From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL 7/7] Samsung SoC for v3.14
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 23:39:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566886.jecinlyiQ0@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131222221141.GF13365@quad.lixom.net>
Hi Olof,
On Sunday 22 of December 2013 14:11:41 Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 05:23:01AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
> >
> > Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
>
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > tags/samsung-soc
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 538cfbb4c40ab59688236484138133b8e3e89220:
> >
> > ARM: dts: Add initial support for Arndale Octa board (2013-12-16
> > 05:05:43 +0900)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not going to pull this.
>
> I've asked you for about 6 months now (ever since Arnd went on leave)
> to please finish his multiplatform work for Exynos. Nothing has happened.
>
> I'm not going to merge any more platform or SoC enablement code
> for Samsung platforms until Exynos has been converted over to
> multiplatform. Sorry.
Well, it's hard to disagree with you on this. Keeping adding new things
constantly definitely does not make us closer to multiplatform support,
as it only increases codebase of code that needs to be cleaned up and made
multiplatform aware.
However it's not that we're not doing anything towards mutliplatform
support. We're slowly getting there. A bit too slowly, but I'm afraid
this is due to the fact that we have definitely too little manpower
working on mainline support of Samsung SoCs.
As for good news, I already have a series cleaning up PM/sleep support
and making it multiplatform friendly and I'm going to post it tomorrow.
The bad news is that it depends on other series and I'm not sure if we
can get it merged in this release. I'll try to do whatever possible to
merge things as soon as possible, though.
>From smaller things, we still need to sort out Exynos cpufreq driver that
has dependencies on headers in plat-samsung/ and mach-exynos/.
Unfortunately I don't have so much time to work on all the things at the
same time, so I hope that someone else could pick this task up. Marek,
Lukasz, what do you think?
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-22 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-15 20:23 [GIT PULL 7/7] Samsung SoC for v3.14 Kukjin Kim
2013-12-22 22:11 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-22 22:39 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-12-23 9:36 ` Lukasz Majewski
2013-12-23 21:38 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-24 1:35 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-12-24 3:09 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1566886.jecinlyiQ0@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).