From: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/stm32-exti: Use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:00:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1568991643-7549-1-git-send-email-fabien.dessenne@st.com> (raw)
Now that the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API is available use it.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 65 +++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index e00f2fa..7fc0d1f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
-#define HWSPNLCK_RETRY_DELAY 100 /* usec */
struct stm32_exti_bank {
u32 imr_ofst;
@@ -277,55 +276,24 @@ static int stm32_exti_set_type(struct irq_data *d,
return 0;
}
-static int stm32_exti_hwspin_lock(struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data)
-{
- int ret, timeout = 0;
-
- if (!chip_data->host_data->hwlock)
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * Use the x_raw API since we are under spin_lock protection.
- * Do not use the x_timeout API because we are under irq_disable
- * mode (see __setup_irq())
- */
- do {
- ret = hwspin_trylock_raw(chip_data->host_data->hwlock);
- if (!ret)
- return 0;
-
- udelay(HWSPNLCK_RETRY_DELAY);
- timeout += HWSPNLCK_RETRY_DELAY;
- } while (timeout < HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
-
- if (ret == -EBUSY)
- ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-
- if (ret)
- pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void stm32_exti_hwspin_unlock(struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data)
-{
- if (chip_data->host_data->hwlock)
- hwspin_unlock_raw(chip_data->host_data->hwlock);
-}
-
static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data = gc->private;
const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = chip_data->reg_bank;
+ struct hwspinlock *hwlock = chip_data->host_data->hwlock;
u32 rtsr, ftsr;
int err;
irq_gc_lock(gc);
- err = stm32_exti_hwspin_lock(chip_data);
- if (err)
- goto unlock;
+ if (hwlock) {
+ err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
@@ -338,7 +306,8 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
unspinlock:
- stm32_exti_hwspin_unlock(chip_data);
+ if (hwlock)
+ hwspin_unlock_in_atomic(hwlock);
unlock:
irq_gc_unlock(gc);
@@ -504,15 +473,20 @@ static int stm32_exti_h_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = chip_data->reg_bank;
+ struct hwspinlock *hwlock = chip_data->host_data->hwlock;
void __iomem *base = chip_data->host_data->base;
u32 rtsr, ftsr;
int err;
raw_spin_lock(&chip_data->rlock);
- err = stm32_exti_hwspin_lock(chip_data);
- if (err)
- goto unlock;
+ if (hwlock) {
+ err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
rtsr = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
ftsr = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
@@ -525,7 +499,8 @@ static int stm32_exti_h_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
writel_relaxed(ftsr, base + stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
unspinlock:
- stm32_exti_hwspin_unlock(chip_data);
+ if (hwlock)
+ hwspin_unlock_in_atomic(hwlock);
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&chip_data->rlock);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-20 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-20 15:00 Fabien Dessenne [this message]
2019-12-03 10:29 ` [PATCH] irqchip/stm32-exti: Use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API Fabien DESSENNE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1568991643-7549-1-git-send-email-fabien.dessenne@st.com \
--to=fabien.dessenne@st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox