[PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check

From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:57:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1581931668-11559-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581931668-11559-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>

Some existing/future meta cpucaps match need the presence of individual
cpucaps. Currently the individual cpucaps checks it via an array based
flag and this introduces dependency on the array entry order.
This limitation exists only for system scope cpufeature.

This patch introduces an internal helper function (__system_matches_cap)
to invoke the matching handler for system scope. This helper has to be
used during a narrow window when,
- The system wide safe registers are set with all the SMP CPUs and,
- The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set.

Normal users should use the existing cpus_have_{const_}cap() global
function.

Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v4:
 * Made the helper function static and updated the commit message
   as suggested by Suzuki [1].

[1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-January/707722.html

 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 0b67156..3818685 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused)
 
 static void cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap);
 
+static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n);
+
 /*
  * NOTE: Any changes to the visibility of features should be kept in
  * sync with the documentation of the CPU feature register ABI.
@@ -2146,6 +2148,17 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n)
+{
+	if (n < ARM64_NCAPS) {
+		const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap = cpu_hwcaps_ptrs[n];
+
+		if (cap)
+			return cap->matches(cap, SCOPE_SYSTEM);
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 void cpu_set_feature(unsigned int num)
 {
 	WARN_ON(num >= MAX_CPU_FEATURES);
@@ -2218,7 +2231,7 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
 static bool __maybe_unused
 cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused)
 {
-	return (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_PAN) && !cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_UAO));
+	return (__system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_PAN) && !__system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_UAO));
 }
 
 static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
