From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avri.altman@wdc.com,
cang@codeaurora.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
peter.wang@mediatek.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] scsi: ufs: Fix possible VCC power drain during runtime suspend
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:23:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1589959408.7715.7.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d32fba1-f7c3-f043-42b6-0da065e9795b@codeaurora.org>
Hi, Asutosh,
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 09:27 -0700, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> Hi Stanley,
>
> On 5/16/2020 10:46 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > The commit "scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime
> > suspend" promises essential resource, i.e., for UFS devices doing
> > WriteBooster buffer flush and Auto BKOPs. However if device
> > finishes its job but not resumed for a very long time, system
> > will have unnecessary power drain because VCC is still supplied.
> >
> > To fix this, a method to recheck the threshold of keeping VCC
> > supply is required. However, the threshold recheck needs to
> > re-activate the link because the decision depends on the device
> > status.
> >
> > Introduce a delayed work to force runtime resume after a certain
> > delay during runtime suspend. This makes threshold recheck simpler
> > which will be done in the next runtime-suspend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
>
> Is there a reason to have this code as a separate patch?
> [1] Commit: "scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend"
> introduces 'keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode' and the very next change (this one)
> removes it.
> Do you think this change and [1] should be merged?
Yes, these 2 patches shall be merged. I will do it in next version.
>
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 +
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> > index db07eedfed96..c70845d41449 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> > @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
> > u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup;
> > u8 b_wb_buffer_type;
> > u32 d_wb_alloc_units;
> > + bool b_rpm_dev_flush_capable;
> > u8 b_presrv_uspc_en;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index f4f2c7b5ab0a..a137553f9b41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@
> > /* default delay of autosuspend: 2000 ms */
> > #define RPM_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY_MS 2000
> >
> > +/* Default delay of RPM device flush delayed work */
> > +#define RPM_DEV_FLUSH_RECHECK_WORK_DELAY_MS 5000
> > +
> > /* Default value of wait time before gating device ref clock */
> > #define UFSHCD_REF_CLK_GATING_WAIT_US 0xFF /* microsecs */
> >
> > @@ -5310,7 +5313,7 @@ static bool ufshcd_wb_presrv_usrspc_keep_vcc_on(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > +static bool ufshcd_wb_need_flush(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > u32 avail_buf;
> > @@ -5348,6 +5351,21 @@ static bool ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > return ufshcd_wb_presrv_usrspc_keep_vcc_on(hba, avail_buf);
> > }
> >
> > +static void ufshcd_rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct ufs_hba *hba = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> > + struct ufs_hba,
> > + rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> > + /*
> > + * To prevent unnecessary VCC power drain after device finishes
> > + * WriteBooster buffer flush or Auto BKOPs, force runtime resume
> > + * after a certain delay to recheck the threshold by next runtime
> > + * supsend.
> > + */
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * ufshcd_exception_event_handler - handle exceptions raised by device
> > * @work: pointer to work data
> > @@ -8164,7 +8182,6 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> > enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl;
> > enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode;
> > enum uic_link_state req_link_state;
> > - bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false;
> >
> > hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1;
> > if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) {
> > @@ -8224,11 +8241,12 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> > * Hibern8, keep device power mode as "active power mode"
> > * and VCC supply.
> > */
> > - keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled ||
> > + hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable =
> > + hba->auto_bkops_enabled ||
> > (((req_link_state == UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE) ||
> > ((req_link_state == UIC_LINK_ACTIVE_STATE) &&
> > ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(hba))) &&
> > - ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba));
> > + ufshcd_wb_need_flush(hba));
> > }
> >
> > if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
> > @@ -8238,7 +8256,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> > ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
> > }
> >
> > - if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
> > + if (!hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> > ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode);
> > if (ret)
> > goto enable_gating;
> > @@ -8295,9 +8313,16 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> > if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed)
> > ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(hba);
> > hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false;
> > + hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
> > ufshcd_release(hba);
> > out:
> > + if (hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work,
> > + msecs_to_jiffies(RPM_DEV_FLUSH_RECHECK_WORK_DELAY_MS));
> > + }
> > +
> > hba->pm_op_in_progress = 0;
> > +
> Nitpick; newline, perhaps?
Thanks, I Will remove it.
>
> > if (ret)
> > ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.suspend_err, (u32)ret);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -8386,6 +8411,11 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> > /* Enable Auto-Hibernate if configured */
> > ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(hba);
> >
> > + if (hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> > + hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
> > + cancel_delayed_work(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Schedule clock gating in case of no access to UFS device yet */
> > ufshcd_release(hba);
> >
> > @@ -8859,6 +8889,9 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> > UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE,
> > UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE);
> >
> > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work,
> > + ufshcd_rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> > +
> > /* Set the default auto-hiberate idle timer value to 150 ms */
> > if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba) && !hba->ahit) {
> > hba->ahit = FIELD_PREP(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, 150) |
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > index 8db7a6101892..9acd437037e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> > struct request_queue *bsg_queue;
> > bool wb_buf_flush_enabled;
> > bool wb_enabled;
> > + struct delayed_work rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work;
> > };
> >
> > /* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
> >
>
>
Thanks,
Stanley Chu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-16 17:46 [PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster and cleanup UFS driver Stanley Chu
2020-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] scsi: ufs: Remove unnecessary memset for dev_info Stanley Chu
2020-05-17 6:11 ` Avri Altman
2020-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: ufs: Allow WriteBooster on UFS 2.2 devices Stanley Chu
2020-05-17 6:12 ` Avri Altman
2020-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] scsi: ufs: Fix index of attributes query for WriteBooster feature Stanley Chu
2020-05-17 6:13 ` Avri Altman
2020-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend Stanley Chu
2020-05-16 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] scsi: ufs: Fix possible VCC power drain " Stanley Chu
2020-05-19 16:27 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-05-20 7:23 ` Stanley Chu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1589959408.7715.7.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox