From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix rk3288 cpuclk core dividers
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:22:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1590307.oZ7E5cNY8h@phil> (raw)
Commit 0e5bdb3f9fa5 (clk: rockchip: switch to using the new cpuclk type
for armclk) didn't take into account that the divider used on rk3288
are of the (n+1) type.
The rk3066 and rk3188 socs use more complex divider types making it
necessary for the list-elements to be the real register-values to write.
Therefore reduce divider values in the table accordingly so that they
really are the values that should be written to the registers.
Reported-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
Fixes: 0e5bdb3f9fa5
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
index ac6be7c..11194b8 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
@@ -145,20 +145,20 @@ struct rockchip_pll_rate_table rk3288_pll_rates[] = {
}
static struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table rk3288_cpuclk_rates[] __initdata = {
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1800000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1704000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1608000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1512000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1416000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1200000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1008000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 816000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 696000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 600000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 408000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 312000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 216000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
- RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 126000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1800000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1704000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1608000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1512000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1416000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1200000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1008000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 816000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 696000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 600000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 408000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 312000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 216000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+ RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 126000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
};
static const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data rk3288_cpuclk_data = {
--
2.1.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-18 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-18 19:22 Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-12-18 19:40 ` [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix rk3288 cpuclk core dividers Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-18 22:16 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-28 22:19 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1590307.oZ7E5cNY8h@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).