[PATCH V8 1/6] clk: imx6sl: Use BIT(x) to avoid shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits

[Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>]

Use readl_relaxed() instead of __raw_readl(), and use BIT(x)
instead of (1 << X) to fix below build warning reported by kernel
test robot:

drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c:149:49: warning: Shifting signed 32-bit
value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour [shiftTooManyBitsSigned]
     while (!(__raw_readl(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))

Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
changes since V7:
	- remove unnecessary linux/bitfield.h include.
---
 drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
index 0f647d1..8894876 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6sl.c
@@ -14,19 +14,19 @@
 #include "clk.h"
 
 #define CCSR			0xc
-#define BM_CCSR_PLL1_SW_CLK_SEL	(1 << 2)
+#define BM_CCSR_PLL1_SW_CLK_SEL	BIT(2)
 #define CACRR			0x10
 #define CDHIPR			0x48
-#define BM_CDHIPR_ARM_PODF_BUSY	(1 << 16)
+#define BM_CDHIPR_ARM_PODF_BUSY	BIT(16)
 #define ARM_WAIT_DIV_396M	2
 #define ARM_WAIT_DIV_792M	4
 #define ARM_WAIT_DIV_996M	6
 
 #define PLL_ARM			0x0
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_DIV_SELECT	(0x7f << 0)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN	(1 << 12)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE	(1 << 13)
-#define BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK		(1 << 31)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_DIV_SELECT	0x7f
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN	BIT(12)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE	BIT(13)
+#define BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK		BIT(31)
 #define PLL_ARM_DIV_792M	66
 
 static const char *step_sels[]		= { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void imx6sl_enable_pll_arm(bool enable)
 		val |= BM_PLL_ARM_ENABLE;
 		val &= ~BM_PLL_ARM_POWERDOWN;
 		writel_relaxed(val, anatop_base + PLL_ARM);
-		while (!(__raw_readl(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))
+		while (!(readl_relaxed(anatop_base + PLL_ARM) & BM_PLL_ARM_LOCK))
 			;
 	} else {
 		 writel_relaxed(saved_pll_arm, anatop_base + PLL_ARM);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel