public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuanjia Liu <Chuanjia.Liu@mediatek.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Split PCIe node to comply with hardware design
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:46:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1596440772.7361.35.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721074915.14516-1-Chuanjia.Liu@mediatek.com>

On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:49 +0800, chuanjia.liu wrote:
> There are two independent PCIe controllers in MT2712 and MT7622
> platform, and each of them should contain an independent MSI
> domain.
> 
> In current architecture, MSI domain will be inherited from the
> root bridge, and all of the devices will share the same MSI domain.
> Hence that, the PCIe devices will not work properly if the irq
> number which required is more than 32.
> 
> Split the PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 platform to fix MSI
> issue and comply with the hardware design.


Hi Lorenzo,

       gentle ping for this patchset.


       BTW. I don't see it in [1],but is ok in [2], I don't know why.

[1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/
[2]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200721074915.14516-1-Chuanjia.Liu@mediatek.com/

Best Regards,
Chuanjia

> 
> change note:
>   v4:change commit message due to bayes statistical bogofilter
>      considers this series patch SPAM.
>   v3:rebase for 5.8-rc1. Only collect ack of Ryder, No code change.
>   v2:change the allocation of MT2712 PCIe MMIO space due to the
>      allocation size is not right in v1.
> 
> chuanjia.liu (4):
>   dt-bindings: pci: mediatek: Modified the Device tree bindings
>   PCI: mediatek: Use regmap to get shared pcie-cfg base
>   arm64: dts: mediatek: Split PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622
>   ARM: dts: mediatek: Modified MT7629 PCIe node
> 
>  .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml       |  38 +++++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 144 +++++++++++-------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7629-rfb.dts              |   3 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7629.dtsi                 |  23 +--
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi     |  75 +++++----
>  .../dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts  |  16 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-rfb1.dts  |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi      |  68 ++++++---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c        |  25 ++-
>  9 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-03  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-21  7:49 [PATCH v4 0/4] Split PCIe node to comply with hardware design chuanjia.liu
2020-07-21  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: pci: mediatek: Modified the Device tree bindings chuanjia.liu
2020-07-21  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: mediatek: Use regmap to get shared pcie-cfg base chuanjia.liu
2020-07-21  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: Split PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 chuanjia.liu
2020-07-21  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: mediatek: Modified MT7629 PCIe node chuanjia.liu
2020-08-03  7:46 ` Chuanjia Liu [this message]
2020-09-08  6:13   ` Aw: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Split PCIe node to comply with hardware design Frank Wunderlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1596440772.7361.35.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox