From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B85C433E1 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A9622DCC for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="xBQh7/uy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="IpUvh9o8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7A9622DCC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6IrGUvoRh1dqSTWXgyrtNJKWEDDrPaT5znGvB0cMpHY=; b=xBQh7/uyc6XDLzL9Ne/6PuGPb vpofvJ/0IoZV5sHliLHCYAFeWsHnP1xbJsbW3/cF5yoiRxKDTA8OWE6/k3oCW2DrB4DdEwLdGxE/d UwQ8FTUioj0shXXEH0dPT7lgiy0bGlmAg+5gft+mV1ZwptofN98NA3FOrrezLnO8dBsJhd8x2zpFm I4IfmDApjAN9eR6frX7A2FJkgKGM+5HYC8h50kGJJjcpZujeHT23QTkrZvHo08Vsqk+gCdV3fy399 GJZUk2fgN+mBZ4sxw4gvS/LS+PJhOJtHG/PB4bXNXsHGWh91JTNzI2mzBlbK4ZK+cfq5O2AAMuNeF iVgyQMUgQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3cFy-0000QH-4B; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:32:14 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3cFu-0000OG-5S; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:32:11 +0000 X-UUID: df7004e9f3ab42bb8f270f4729dd7a62-20200806 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=dAz5+dikMY45dDgsG5MgvToc8YR8PWJHsZfl2lLC1rs=; b=IpUvh9o85Xes95IFPj8nFoJF1Iv/L0cr/1rdZCcUhyh+EVaMS40dr5IiedZw+CyXebqM6y4ZD8zL/Twvu/26WeWwPLY5FVDx2Q2mgl83r1wCeLtQlbjy4ETPFNcx1u4lpRzdfKQZemGAxtNygI3aRN3gH64dkx5OqhGwFN/7k0w=; X-UUID: df7004e9f3ab42bb8f270f4729dd7a62-20200806 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1662576680; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 01:32:05 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS02N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:22:03 -0700 Received: from mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.126) by mtkmbs02n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:22:00 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:22:00 +0800 From: Weiyi Lu To: Enric Balletbo Serra , Matthias Brugger , Nicolas Boichat , "Rob Herring" , Sascha Hauer Subject: [PATCH v17 08/12] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:21:51 +0800 Message-ID: <1596705715-15320-9-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.1.dirty In-Reply-To: <1596705715-15320-1-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> References: <1596705715-15320-1-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 136E1D456467830D06C2796C988E92E6E87735DDE12877E946BEB67FF3B99FB22000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200806_053210_371800_27C96607 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: James Liao , Weiyi Lu , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fan Chen , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram. We add a cap "MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO" to judge if we need to do the extra sram isolation control or not. Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c index ec62143..4587cef 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #define MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP BIT(0) #define MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM BIT(1) +#define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO BIT(2) #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x) ((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x)) #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON 0x0210 @@ -57,6 +58,8 @@ #define PWR_ON_BIT BIT(2) #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT BIT(3) #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT BIT(4) +#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT BIT(5) +#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT BIT(6) #define PWR_STATUS_CONN BIT(1) #define PWR_STATUS_DISP BIT(3) @@ -290,6 +293,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) return ret; } + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO)) { + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + udelay(1); + val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + } + return 0; } @@ -299,8 +310,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; int tmp; - val = readl(ctl_addr); - val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO)) { + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + udelay(1); + } + + val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; writel(val, ctl_addr); /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ -- 1.8.1.1.dirty _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel