From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AEFC433E2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDB820715 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="wGMbqVOO"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="bZSqCHxH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AEDB820715 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=0nqEcLErLWA+YDoAlVjxWo6anLQ9zJFZgvZ4AdFVEfw=; b=wGMbqVOORRWe6ihjBdJQs5Xry kVmiVl7FZtHFkwqxOrraznEVpsHvdOs0Zvaam2vN1ekmVffzl9shWA9vtnqda2Od7cqIpweQsmej+ ZELB6VZudYtmYzXrUCJ2mOxF/Yd4KaoeiMGfLnDtPDB+jtWAp/3IrHZKVht5RQiSZEbrMdp+UQERn 2umF/Kvq5N94iSwA9M8Wm6GQXo0qkoMb5+4KgSRDWYvvE4TnXlh/aWDOqAyCf78A6QUV5WkLR8e0X 7tj6Dfb7fjqWWTQCa14s9SDMpjWFQA0dpuUR+lusOKytjHF6peF46rqDlK8JnMJKxakQcscqDnCex /hYAdZnng==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIjiW-0003bN-9A; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:32:12 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIjiS-0003av-Bu; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:32:10 +0000 X-UUID: aff314d58f3e48dda4c85b8444b1525a-20200916 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=55vZkGLvgoeApgdN8nM2vlO2w+ACfA3EPA25BOlXP70=; b=bZSqCHxHRCTfgbe5XYPyHlPB48YAIS7XGniDa3QYe7igJJ5UHfaK9BSvttbbJGntPtI0pGBBgymqBvM2ego2yTc7UfPEPm7odDLc9RIg7pyxNnlLWOvvg2TiTw+y/rhfqfccY9WbvXyTsS0oG/U7zh3HvhKjxwsXWVOf9QJTwzM=; X-UUID: aff314d58f3e48dda4c85b8444b1525a-20200916 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 708083983; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:32:00 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS01N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.79) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:31:58 -0700 Received: from mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.126) by mtkmbs01n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:31:45 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.33] (172.21.77.33) by mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:31:50 +0800 Message-ID: <1600309910.7042.15.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver From: Hector Yuan To: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:31:50 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1600256353.7042.13.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <1599712262-8819-1-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <20200910050341.pgyieq3q7ijitosn@vireshk-i7> <1599715851.7042.9.camel@mtkswgap22> <20200910053406.t37rgioykzvk3oem@vireshk-i7> <1600256353.7042.13.camel@mtkswgap22> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 7B895C27C73AF267B15AA01BCC80074C1740AE0C6671D6C49EB69B78158A5A792000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200916_223208_961269_5290475F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, Rob sir: Sorry to bother you, may I have your review comment for the binding part? Appreciated. On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 19:39 +0800, Hector Yuan wrote: > Hi, Rob sir: > > Sorry to bother you, may I have your review comment for the binding > part? > Appreciated. > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 11:04 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 10-09-20, 13:30, Hector Yuan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 10:33 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > On 10-09-20, 12:31, Hector Yuan wrote: > > > > > The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs. > > > > > The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine. > > > > > > > > > > This patch depends on the MT6779 DTS patch submitted by Hanks Chen > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/4/1094 > > > > > > > > Thanks for hanging there. Looks good to me. I will apply it once Rob > > > > Ack's the binding patch. > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks for your help. May I know if you can add Reviewed-by tag to > > > this patch set. > > > > Since this patchset is going to get merged via my tree (ARM cpufreq > > tree), a reviewed-by isn't required here. I will queue it up for > > 5.10-rc1 after I receive an Ack from Rob. > > > > > I would like to prepare some patches for more features > > > based on this. Is that okay to you? Thanks again. > > > > That should be fine. > > > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel