public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	gshan@redhat.com, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 0/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Improve memory offline event notifier
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:24:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1601387687-6077-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)

This series brings three different changes to the only memory event notifier on
arm64 platform. These changes improve it's robustness while also enhancing debug
capabilities during potential memory offlining error conditions.

This applies on 5.9-rc7

Changes in V4:

- Dropped additional return in prevent_bootmem_remove_init() per Gavin
- Rearranged memory section loop in prevent_bootmem_remove_notifier() per Gavin
- Call out boot memory ranges for attempted offline or offline events

Changes in V3: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=352717)

- Split the single patch into three patch series per Catalin
- Trigger changed from setup_arch() to early_initcall() per Catalin
- Renamed back memory_hotremove_notifier() as prevent_bootmem_remove_init()
- validate_bootmem_online() is now called from prevent_bootmem_remove_init() per Catalin
- Skip registering the notifier if validate_bootmem_online() returns negative

Changes in V2: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11732161/)

- Dropped all generic changes wrt MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE reasons enumeration
- Dropped all related (processing MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE reasons) changes on arm64
- Added validate_boot_mem_online_state() that gets called with early_initcall()
- Added CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE check before registering memory notifier
- Moved notifier registration i.e memory_hotremove_notifier into setup_arch()

Changes in V1: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/list/?series=271237)

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Anshuman Khandual (3):
  arm64/mm/hotplug: Register boot memory hot remove notifier earlier
  arm64/mm/hotplug: Enable MEM_OFFLINE event handling
  arm64/mm/hotplug: Ensure early memory sections are all online

 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 13:54 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2020-09-29 13:54 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Register boot memory hot remove notifier earlier Anshuman Khandual
2020-10-01 13:51   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-29 13:54 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Enable MEM_OFFLINE event handling Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-30 23:57   ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-06  2:59     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-10-12  3:27       ` Gavin Shan
2020-09-29 13:54 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Ensure early memory sections are all online Anshuman Khandual
2020-10-01  0:53   ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-06  3:11     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-10-12  4:07       ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1601387687-6077-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox