From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F24C4741F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7092065D for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="2p3D5Doq"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="nO8dGzUI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5C7092065D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HTtSCZr32VNiqPCc0Urx3nsQ6OeXgCQijy48R+LZfSo=; b=2p3D5DoqDD99Vf0Rmg515MuoS Molo3QdnrrnIX2jGf1Y684ort6YpSfIAJe8fLj80dmhXT+4n/hxjWUJqKXi61hXLWKvqtDBVUxFTV pe8wYCvov1Jz74UEyw5WZZYQNFYM6bq4Uluirzn6kg0X0mqJKWGVsQbeSE9keqQn622sbh+la4xVs MDgufyn84oIZmvxzOs9wD3g7Um9dZCHNOWQOa8PoPpjQnJG2B71QKVgG5WEUGzuqx1XAD7H/RTuRi Mz9ysi6jfnPm9Wz2767l3iRkT2TOcUONJLFpEdTtMGIZ++AFolaPWH4XwpxpL+hTs7zNVtrwP5w4d YHj6rQERw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kcIf6-00015G-B7; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:41:32 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kcIf2-00014h-1x; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:41:30 +0000 X-UUID: 24adb10d01dd499e9cbd66a89eb7ab55-20201109 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=YjSSNPs9DIKiggA5+V9fbL6MfaunwhMceWHthl8AyvQ=; b=nO8dGzUIDG+QXsinumgcurz/T7wPsQvr1oPc1A7nF2uGE/ORDVrKMr2cPaXTjHVcwXG+f0QJzH/z4yRyz3kSnOATU5ipjC41YTEp5qhOTcaDXEMhpNWle2fifa5iqlrB8JIuxFI+6nZB366Js0YYH18fbyORUb0kY9ga/Rg25VI=; X-UUID: 24adb10d01dd499e9cbd66a89eb7ab55-20201109 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1079026870; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:41:21 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS07N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.141) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:38:41 -0800 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs07n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:38:41 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.4] (172.21.77.4) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:38:40 +0800 Message-ID: <1604972321.16474.9.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fix mtk_clk_register_mux() as static function From: Weiyi Lu To: Greg KH Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:38:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20201109102035.GA1238638@kroah.com> References: <1604914627-9203-1-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <20201109102035.GA1238638@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201109_204128_641659_8E4027BB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Owen Chen , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 11:20 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:37:07PM +0800, Weiyi Lu wrote: > > mtk_clk_register_mux() should be a static function > > > > Fixes: a3ae549917f16 ("clk: mediatek: Add new clkmux register API") > > Cc: > > Why is this for stable trees? Hi Greg, My Mistake. Indeed, this is not a bug fix for stable tree. And there are simple questions. Will I be allowed to keep the fixes tag in this patch to indicate the mistakes we made in previous commit if it's not a bug fix for stable tree? And all I need to do now is to remove stable tree from cc list. Is it correct? Many thanks. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel