From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69FC2D0E4 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5D4241A7 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="0v6ZAt2q"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="KdjM1f1j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF5D4241A7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=n6gNb+SVOnXIblclZ+57LzsttmmRdbS1f3UggpLbZhY=; b=0v6ZAt2qblpkvEOGKv7Hy65Oa Vut1VwsnMQ1iYMN6C9mE31n6DsJQ36nC2i69PVCt+32S9euDt+cPql7NJ5iavbKZ3O6aKzJirY8o9 nC9Pz13d8j01KIjI00LZaOhdN08pMy+lQPtYtpihvv10/beXbS6tjJtEn5B3kzr8XAY/LhEiC82sn g77r7AEe0tAxxPqc34U6IhIQ4XIcjlEZEUqyngUo+yCIZt3BPmgdxbMBg6x/cgmR8PXcGVQf1CiEV sYX4GyE1repYAXzGpRSNQCi3n2GshKOmlJ77X/NqfAXt11KrJg5S0Cj9PqSO/yTEYnDbORIsYD7Br pVCp1fuJA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfCaq-0002DU-DS; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:49:08 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfCak-0002Bg-4V; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:49:04 +0000 X-UUID: be51f4b8b4a0459bad1b83c0fa23f45a-20201117 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=VQSP1sH4CqMAhG3prd+7/b/qG6Nz5rZr5wJPtTA6ytA=; b=KdjM1f1jkck/XS9Jkff1b/1fT6HkJsvyOTfFWbVvSJfB1fw4rvGHi9veUi7iJgTn5ryGAUkSxg5QDJ/Q4AnnKbSFROHd4ZvWjXVk3wxQUds3l0SSaOoGatD36Qo14eFel/6NhtwUCVIzTixII2hG/Cc//vkpWUocC49F4S2chzs=; X-UUID: be51f4b8b4a0459bad1b83c0fa23f45a-20201117 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1417824581; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:48:56 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS33N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.76) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:38:53 -0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS33N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:38:48 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:38:50 +0800 Message-ID: <1605663530.31607.40.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: add additionalProperties From: Chunfeng Yun To: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:38:50 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20201117103123.3938-1-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 5DF35A84F2346C88C9B1BA1AEF6C513A344973A569469D1148B07A014C4095D62000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201117_204902_427382_67A312F2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-samsung-soc , linux-tegra , linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Renesas , linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel , Matthias Brugger , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 11:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Chunfeng, > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Chunfeng Yun wrote: > > Add an explicit "additionalProperties: true" to avoid > > dt_binding_check error caused by: > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > > > This will not change function, due to additionalProperties > > is true by default. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun > > Thanks for your patch! > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.yaml > > @@ -49,3 +49,5 @@ properties: > > - enum: > > - ucrobotics,bubblegum-96 # uCRobotics Bubblegum-96 > > - const: actions,s900 > > + > > +additionalProperties: true > > Looks very similar to commit 62298364bd489b06 ("dt-bindings: Explicitly > allow additional properties in board/SoC schemas") in v5.10-rc2? Yes, indeed, thanks for your info. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel