Re: [v2] PCI: Avoid unsync of LTR mechanism configuration

[Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>]

On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:27 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 06:05:31PM +0800, mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > In bus scan flow, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of DEVCTL2 register is
> > configured in pci_configure_ltr(). If device and bridge both support LTR
> > mechanism, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of device and bridge will be
> > enabled in DEVCTL2 register. And pci_dev->ltr_path will be set as 1.
> > 
> > If PCIe link goes down when device resets, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit
> > of bridge will change to 0 according to PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16. However,
> > the pci_dev->ltr_path value of bridge is still 1.
> > 
> > For following conditions, check and re-configure "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit
> > of bridge to make "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit mtach ltr_path value.
> >    -before configuring device's LTR for hot-remove/hot-add
> >    -before restoring device's DEVCTL2 register when restore device state
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > changes of v2
> >  -modify patch description
> >  -reconfigure bridge's LTR before restoring device DEVCTL2 register
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index b9fecc25d213..88b4eb70c252 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -1437,6 +1437,24 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> > +	struct pci_dev *bridge;
> > +	u32 ctl;
> > +
> > +	bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> > +	if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
> > +		pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl);
> > +		if (!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) {
> > +			pci_dbg(bridge, "re-enabling LTR\n");
> > +			pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
> > +						 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  {
> >  	int i = 0;
> > @@ -1447,6 +1465,13 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	if (!save_state)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Downstream ports reset the LTR enable bit when link goes down.
> > +	 * Check and re-configure the bit here before restoring device.
> > +	 * PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16.
> > +	 */
> > +	pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr(dev);
> > +
> >  	cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
> >  	pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, cap[i++]);
> >  	pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++]);
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 953f15abc850..4ad172517fd2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -2132,9 +2132,22 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	 * Complex and all intermediate Switches indicate support for LTR.
> >  	 * PCIe r4.0, sec 6.18.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> > -	    ((bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev)) &&
> > -	      bridge->ltr_path)) {
> > +	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
> > +		pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
> > +					 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
> > +		dev->ltr_path = 1;
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> > +	if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
> > +		pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl);
> > +		if (!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) {
> > +			pci_dbg(bridge, "re-enabling LTR\n");
> > +			pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
> > +						 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> Can't you use pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr() here too?
> 
> Otherwise looks good.

Thanks for review. I have sent a new patch for this.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210129071137.8743-1-mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com/ 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel