From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71445C433B4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B88D61425 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:36:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9B88D61425 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=G6qBp4P4iLM6MGKissT1j1YxcEuipEfaE1hlLEluGDY=; b=R3K9ue4eFfmgnWmyuhg0KFygC k8BFaZUgV/bcu4E9tAC64ZxNQcAQ9MZnAMeyph6VGlMxMpZXBRIA0jsTPp93aMnoKcFxiuqcBFDNc +qKurJGN6MGKO/qlHeK2K6R+canzZg6YIu+c1iFSkjBOilTH/hiti9CQkUvIWn0+mmVcgUbJyU5W8 okPD3eD9W74oMnrD4Cj9putmSsuQEIRGcktUPkF1sOYuzek1ht7bM87E7dpmIXSjpzMnlgwbgHWJJ s6OclmcWia2aEncTGDboF5fVQYM/wP8LOwYGdIVWRRiNzsqAmq02qhmlC/ID/SUA5ssT1HYTQ3Pqn eHSseevhQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lZZTL-00Goes-3f; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:34:23 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lZZTI-00Goeg-Jd; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:34:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=hK1XFt3NgHfQs9u2fCr26MUE5gl79KLt2NlyA75zy9o=; b=vyIv4IbxQUEjI9MVYRnEmJPvRJ BcBDjC8wg2Gl7BrIdpvS6RDPJbnmrp2rnIgTz/7ZePqCz3ypIiWfxJapSq++/KHGGAVpJEKK/zub8 QJRq3l9CIjkrMKeIZ4GhFibO/FHl88U0srQ9L/esnEl5dHmR2kjDX8rUnA21axd+4XyztEhEo5jBI 9weO4A5B6QJxJLWAV1WCRsUqJa4nLzIIrxVMowqKqWlAp9OjSff8CzBfRaVCFVI6iw/t32AKo+2i7 R06ougXeY+C+8PwjWoKrrCp0NpVdrwEhIv6DWGhAuPPhBHs/POW40Gma5YCqXLN5Rw/eVqUVjNNGg Qve7l2rw==; Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lZZTE-00DifU-Om; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:34:18 +0000 X-UUID: 5c805e9182b4470b80f37a6f9bf4c0a2-20210422 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=hK1XFt3NgHfQs9u2fCr26MUE5gl79KLt2NlyA75zy9o=; b=u+Yc2D0NTpSCsG0pt3OREffuUa4d8PQOXDHCf2IkoUqqheYTeJLfuZPEd3CGJm2MbzY5e6SGB4k6GSZIpexltmFFYAL7XJu/yR7qLVcr5QiIj6rLN8GOxEYurUcvVBtsQGAbsjS9saX/BFbV//wYdnnkIeu4LVdlEVRdVi81UcY=; X-UUID: 5c805e9182b4470b80f37a6f9bf4c0a2-20210422 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 524018921; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:34:07 -0700 Received: from MTKMBS07N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.141) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:34:05 -0700 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs07n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:34:04 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.4] (172.21.77.4) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:34:04 +0800 Message-ID: <1619098444.4507.1.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/8] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor From: andrew-sh.cheng To: Chanwoo Choi CC: MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , , , , , , , Sibi Sankar Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:34:04 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1616499241-4906-1-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com> <233a3bd6-7ab1-5da2-9184-a745eb253d86@samsung.com> <1617177820.15067.1.camel@mtksdaap41> <2ae8604d-0da6-4243-1b92-81b3917d7d48@samsung.com> <1617195800.18432.3.camel@mtksdaap41> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210422_063416_835194_8AFD226D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 32.47 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:47 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 4/1/21 9:16 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > On 3/31/21 10:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 17:35 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>> On 3/31/21 5:27 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On 3/31/21 5:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You are missing to add these patches to linux-pm mailing list. > >>>>>> Need to send them to linu-pm ML. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, before received this series, I tried to clean-up these patches > >>>>>> on testing branch[1]. So that I add my comment with my clean-up case. > >>>>>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!zIrzeDp9vPnm1_SDzVPuzqdHn3zWie9DnfBXaA-j9-CSrVc6aR9_rJQQiw81_CgAPh9XRRs$ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And 'Saravana Kannan ' is wrong email address. > >>>>>> Please update the email or drop this email. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Chanwoo, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you for the advices. > >>>>> I will resend patch v9 (add to linux-pm ML), remove this patch, and note > >>>>> that my patch set base on > >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>>> > >>>> I has not yet test this patch[1] on devfreq-testing-passive-gov branch. > >>>> So that if possible, I'd like you to test your patches with this patch[1] > >>>> and then if there is no problem, could you send the next patches with patch[1]? > >>>> > >>>> [1]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov&id=39c80d11a8f42dd63ecea1e0df595a0ceb83b454__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJR2cQqZs$ > >>> > >>> > >>> Sorry for the confusion. I make the devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] > >>> branch based on latest devfreq-next branch. > >>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ > >>> > >>> First of all, if possible, I want to test them[1] with your patches in this series. > >>> And then if there are no any problem, please let me know. After confirmed from you, > >>> I'll send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >>> How about that? > >>> > >> Hi Chanwoo~ > >> > >> We will use this on Google Chrome project. > >> Google Hsin-Yi has test your patch + my patch set v8 [2~8] > >> > >> make sure cci devfreqs runs with cpufreq. > >> suspend resume > >> speedometer2 benchmark > >> It is okay. > >> > >> Please send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch. > >> > >> I will send patch v9 base on yours latter. > > > > Thanks for your test. I'll send the patches today. > > I'm sorry for delay because when I tested the patches > for devfreq parent type on Odroid-xu3, there are some problem > related to lazy linking of OPP. So I'm trying to analyze them. > Unfortunately, we need to postpone these patches to next linux > version. > > Hi Chanwoo, Sorry to bother you. Do you work on this patch now? Is there any thing that we can do? > [snip] > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel