From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74026C4338F for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379A060EAF for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:19:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 379A060EAF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bsEJOpMKIw1fANIkQIm+uJ8p0rP3einZp9medwigT/s=; b=PpN4VHKO5I96/C 7YZLwjAW2DRkq2Qy5RetQkJlyP3CjBH+UeUMc3Kih7+0JaYLMZUeC4pIXEoR7zb33hcqw6mQtfD10 hg4E845z1IZBFbwMOn4jx4a0PjxdD9rfjnLo6tvJqgOP+8STY+Y+LkrdINATdHffiM9PDycGW8spj mPkUrYm+HekUNFBf/Q+rVvO6vKXqD+yFeeSF4Pz020IlPyYUBX+sYdGztq6fo43fAPFeLutZEto6Z aS5Vk8nXVUSU0Vvl8uDTydwg16KUZD7l0iACCgUVonPjUop+PR+Co3EDWY6B5J8/zCwrU9B253xwV TMmrsHq6QMyKu+2xiBUg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6pRH-003fqK-2d; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:17:43 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6pRD-003fpQ-5Z; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:17:40 +0000 X-UUID: 3e9cdee0af3c4bedae54a302a9abe914-20210723 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=prDrh7DxvcudMBmuQ1JSmdMeIVoEkDXcOOdpbvc2mFA=; b=QI6jc+ZVluBVkxEG3ZV3sBFIUZDM97gmELDiXF/AEQI7ajf4sXdARMqMiH4kcznjq+GCXDI1lpw2gaCJXuYd6IMGyM8llAodIzi1B9TAzvMr1XrdtAnMmdKF15rtlebhqXtxSUP9oknFJ6wmBAReIxBMzfQ9XwfQ9tlDR+Rc4Qw=; X-UUID: 3e9cdee0af3c4bedae54a302a9abe914-20210723 Received: from mtkcas67.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.45)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 496204382; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:17:35 -0700 Received: from MTKMBS02N1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.77) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:17:34 -0700 Received: from mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.84) by mtkmbs02n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:17:27 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:17:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1627024646.19956.2.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek: Update the Device tree bindings From: Chuanjia Liu To: Rob Herring CC: Matthias Brugger , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jianjun Wang , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , linux-arm-kernel , Ryder Lee , PCI , Frank Wunderlich , , Yong Wu Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:17:26 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20210719073456.28666-1-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> <20210719073456.28666-2-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> <20210719224718.GA2766057@robh.at.kernel.org> <1626746843.2466.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210723_001739_256535_D16C8D85 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2021-07-20 at 10:26 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:07 PM Chuanjia Liu wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 16:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:34:53 +0800, Chuanjia Liu wrote: > > > > There are two independent PCIe controllers in MT2712 and MT7622 > > > > platform. Each of them should contain an independent MSI domain. > > > > > > > > In old dts architecture, MSI domain will be inherited from the root > > > > bridge, and all of the devices will share the same MSI domain. > > > > Hence that, the PCIe devices will not work properly if the irq number > > > > which required is more than 32. > > > > > > > > Split the PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 platform to comply with > > > > the hardware design and fix MSI issue. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuanjia Liu > > > > Acked-by: Ryder Lee > > > > --- > > > > .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml | 39 ++++ > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 206 ++++++++++-------- > > > > 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > > > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > > > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > > > > Hi,Rob > > I have described in the cover letter: > > v11:Rebase for 5.14-rc1 and add "interrupt-names", "linux,pci-domain" > > description in binding file. No code change. > > if you still ok for this, I will add R-b in next version. > > Yes, it's fine. > > In the future, put the changelog for a patch in the patch. Hi, Rob Thanks for you suggestion, I will do this in future versions. Best regards _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel