linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sieber, Fernand" <sieberf@amazon.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: poll cmdq until it has space
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:12:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1632244345526.44611@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1c10203-ffd3-25f9-f2c6-9cee3458aac9@huawei.com>

Hi John,

> But is the polarity really correct? That is, if we don't have space,
> then exit with success (the function to check for space).

You are absolutely correct, this is a mistake that I made as I was resolving conflicts while porting this patch to iommu/next from 5.4 where I implemented and tested it.
It should be:

> -             if (!queue_full(llq))
> +             if (queue_has_space(llq, n))


> what is llq->state->val?

This is an other oversight for the same reason, llq->state->val has since then been renamed llq->val

Will fix both of these in the next revision.
Thanks and kind regards,

--Fernand

________________________________________
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 18:22
To: Sieber, Fernand; will@kernel.org; robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: poll cmdq until it has space

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.



On 21/09/2021 12:43, Fernand Sieber wrote:
>       do {

I didn't follow the full logic of this change yet ...

>               llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
> -             if (!queue_full(llq))
> +             if (!queue_has_space(llq, n))

But is the polarity really correct? That is, if we don't have space,
then exit with success (the function to check for space).

>                       break;
>
> +             /*
> +              * We must return here even if there's no space, because the producer
> +              * having moved forward could mean that the last thread observing the
> +              * SMMU progress has allocated space in the cmdq and moved on, leaving
> +              * us in this waiting loop with no other thread updating
> +              * llq->state->val.

what is llq->state->val?

> +              */
> +             if (llq->prod != prod)
> +                     return -EAGAIN;
> +
>               ret = queue_poll(&qp);

Thanks,
John

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21 11:43 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: poll cmdq until it has space Fernand Sieber
2021-09-21 16:22 ` John Garry
2021-09-21 17:12   ` Sieber, Fernand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1632244345526.44611@amazon.com \
    --to=sieberf@amazon.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).