Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] arm64: mm: Support Common Not Private translations
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:29:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16344e26-6cd2-5e55-d34e-fd2a48bef733@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730154209.2tawriqxgxub7paa@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>

On 30/07/18 16:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:08:27AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 27/07/18 12:35, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:18:20AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>>> index 39ec0b8..c506fb7 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>>>> @@ -149,6 +149,18 @@ static inline void cpu_replace_ttbr1(pgd_t *pgdp)
>>>>   
>>>>   	phys_addr_t pgd_phys = virt_to_phys(pgdp);
>>>>   
>>>> +	if (system_supports_cnp() && !WARN_ON(pgdp != lm_alias(swapper_pg_dir))) {
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * cpu_replace_ttbr1() is used when there's a boot CPU
>>>> +		 * up (i.e. cpufeature framework is not up yet) and
>>>> +		 * latter only when we enable CNP via cpufeature's
>>>> +		 * enable() callback.
>>>> +		 * Also we rely on the cpu_hwcap bit being set before
>>>> +		 * calling the enable() function.
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		pgd_phys |= TTBR_CNP_BIT;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>>   	replace_phys = (void *)__pa_symbol(idmap_cpu_replace_ttbr1);
>>>
>>> So the above code sets the TTBR_CNP_BIT (bit 0) in pgd_phys and calls
>>> the idmap_cpu_replace_ttbr1() with this value. Looking at the latter, it
>>> performs a phys_to_ttbr transformation of pgd_phys which masks out the
>>> bottom 2 bits when CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52 is enabled. I think we need
>>> to tweak TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52 to start from bit 0.
>>
>> Something like bellow?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
>> index 0bcc98d..e0b4b2f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
>> @@ -524,11 +524,10 @@ USER(\label, ic	ivau, \tmp2)			// invalidate I line PoU
>>    * 	ttbr:	returns the TTBR value
>>    */
>>   	.macro	phys_to_ttbr, ttbr, phys
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
>> -	orr	\ttbr, \phys, \phys, lsr #46
>> -	and	\ttbr, \ttbr, #TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52
>> -#else
>>   	mov	\ttbr, \phys
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
>> +	ubfx	\ttbr, \ttbr, #48, #4
>> +	orr	\ttbr, \phys, \ttbr, lsl #2
>>   #endif
>>   	.endm
> 
> This would do, I don't have a better idea on how to write it. But I'd
> like a comment to say that this is moving bits 51:48 of the address to
> bits 5:2 of TTBR_ELx.

The diff above is *copying* 51:48 into 5:2; it doesn't *move* it like 
the existing code does. That's pretty crucial, because without the BADDR 
masking operation it's going to leave the upper address bits in the 
ASID/VMID field, which looks like a recipe for disaster if the reserved 
TTBR1 happens to be at a high enough address (at least cpu_switch_mm 
might just be OK by virtue of using BFI rather than ORR for the ASID).

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 1bdeca8..1b9d0e9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>   #define kc_offset_to_vaddr(o)	((o) | VA_START)
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
>> -#define phys_to_ttbr(addr)	(((addr) | ((addr) >> 46)) & TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52)
>> +#define phys_to_ttbr(addr)	((addr) | (((addr) >> 46) & TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52))

Ditto - by the look of things, this definitely stands to corrupt the 
VMID in update_vttbr(). If we really have no choice but to smuggle the 
CnP value in something which is logically an address, then I think we'd 
need to handle it more like this:

#define TTBR_CNP (1)
#define phys_to_ttbr(addr) \
((((addr) | ((addr) >> 46)) & TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52) | (addr & TTBR_CNP))

Although in patch #2 we're only applying CnP *after* the BADDR 
conversion, so is changing this one even necessary? If I've understood 
the intent correctly, all that might be needed is something like the 
below (untested, of course).

Robin.

----->8-----
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h 
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
index 0bcc98dbba56..5b0f8f80238f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -527,6 +527,7 @@ USER(\label, ic	ivau, \tmp2)			// invalidate I line PoU
  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
  	orr	\ttbr, \phys, \phys, lsr #46
  	and	\ttbr, \ttbr, #TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52
+	bfi	\ttbr, \addr, #0, #1	// CnP
  #else
  	mov	\ttbr, \phys
  #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19 10:18 [PATCH v5 0/3] Support Common Not Private translations Vladimir Murzin
2018-06-19 10:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] arm64: mm: " Vladimir Murzin
2018-07-27 11:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-30 10:08     ` Vladimir Murzin
2018-07-30 15:42       ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-30 16:29         ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-07-30 17:03           ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-31 10:17             ` Vladimir Murzin
2018-07-31 11:29               ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-30 16:24   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-31 10:18     ` Vladimir Murzin
2018-06-19 10:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: KVM: Enable " Vladimir Murzin
2018-07-27 11:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-27 12:02     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-19 10:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: Introduce command line parameter to disable CNP Vladimir Murzin
2018-07-27 11:43   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16344e26-6cd2-5e55-d34e-fd2a48bef733@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox