From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DAA1C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:37:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=asgdAFAUsdmjJkjECHH2eIEoRQuGMTSeSLXEOj6PhK4=; b=rV1314bCLi3zed lNow3YHuCeaC94eXCvhT7lx1uNHa0l20gMM6Sebfzu1gdqqBiq1HgEbgfFX888f5yQAV3GrQAoEJu l03cH9sVQPda9O0uLs2yNuFrrjH+n/dKkaAs+vr9sDlP+OBokWhXVS25NlyaWO3l2oY0828Pq7Oz/ kdLFh2QzXUg9KxoXDnU0KTy5/hiJ+OVpAHQDOU4ohr1lmLd4E1lE3UBdRw9TKhE+Se0ob1kuaMrIh mgbC0Qtl4+gy8dlPb3AzFhK8hM8LCnUL7sVtFuAxnHkDlcSKtdrm65NalXKxLfWFjtjjtQp2MPWeN /KQdSBunVqqT0YGa3UeQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mxCdz-00FNQj-N3; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:35:19 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mxCcH-00FMma-WA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:33:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752FB616A3; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E099FC34604; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:33:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1639506812; bh=qsLZ0GRNKuc0Rn98RTEffc2nd7ljiXNOz7pm7SbnCT8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CEjIlxVyG4RK64S+/c7POkJnGTc6Wrg93c3gLajPUxqqJoMDr5Wiv7xFUi/t1b95J Yj5uoT25PiBJgRbbkNBAdzBZpakwx0WMF/WXJ2rC16g3Tx8/cKkSrseWgE61y3UP+q Wn5gpVXtCGQq5ZyekcJrd1nM+jSV7ylS7Ydhp0zcaOe8A3Jr7LAS1CDD/ZoOMpz4RN mvIP/sVNjKDhdyyLVH2RzEnqXXqTsin+PXd6L1TIcWPHIzeA0L8I6NfoC/Zk3+J1YQ DljawJKgUr/kDuF2KH+Wd1sB9/CI1gETYw+KqWf1n4NKHiSAq6VcQJQi4b3cD8derU 0lEwGVoxp3OBA== From: Will Deacon To: Robin Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , suzuki.poulose@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: PMU updates Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:33:26 +0000 Message-Id: <163950511279.725168.3379356222366423286.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211214_103334_128854_0876AB60 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and > the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep > things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no > longer included since Rob has picked it up separately. > > Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a > substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth > implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be > converted from a function template to a structure template as and when > the time comes. > > [...] Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks! [1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47 [2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b [3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59 Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel