From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:34:35 +0200
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung Fixes for v3.1-rc7
In-Reply-To: <20110916134300.GB16280@suse.de>
References: <00b101cc738d$bcf46ce0$36dd46a0$%kim@samsung.com>
	<00cf01cc7466$e2cd66e0$a86834a0$%kim@samsung.com>
	<20110916134300.GB16280@suse.de>
Message-ID: <1642876.jgt6epCtEP@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 16 September 2011 15:43:00 Greg KH wrote:
> > In this case, I'm not sure which following method is proper...
> > - to send 'pull request' to Greg / stable at kernel.org like bug fix during -rc
> > - to submit each patches with adding 'Cc: stable at kernel.org' again
> > - or ?

The patches are currently queued in the stable branch of the arm-soc
tree, I haven't forwarded them to Linus yet. I can easily change
the changelog before I actually send them on (if you tell me which ones
they are, or I can pull an updated set of patches to replace them.

> Are these in Linus's tree already?  If so, send me the git commit ids
> and I will add them to the stable kernels.
> 
> If not, wait until they are, and then send me the git commit ids, and I
> will then add them.

This is fine with me as well, but I'm trying to get more people to
send me patches that are annotated already. I forgot to ask during
the last set of bug fixes I forwarded and should probably go through
the ones that are already merged and ask the authors about backporting.

	Arnd