From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FA0C433EF for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:20:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mTOV8oZ90WZiwl9s1s5FBZvZ3n8S8pHUJePdsJ9dxAo=; b=FOvMILAOKDzQxS LN+jbOsIUMoRLhjHoamhq/AfnftLlBMYhXI4jh3c7wpZd++FtcV4XHlMFiH3W8qtHpi+9fPChMd6m dx3A9V0OuAD6uQrmq+eqTZP2O2lnLcoKo0YCROlAO5dhuECoGTnPONhgQGfB5FePdwLTCcFosEOUC LztMvY+EMSbX8ciLDGlO71jKs4jzV0kVc8EYhHBYfTBJ4mCkv0+BV4LPxplas0VWP4XEgUtKjjpN/ ID1nuIqChF7WK6Uonjk/whrccN4xeSC3m2b7BBNSXgWOQZqfgydys6R9mx9LAput3Fcf+nr2GNDSe GYF09Tu3H0pkZj1bcCSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nK75p-004sIc-Ms; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:18:45 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nK75l-004sHR-Jc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:18:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1935DB81D4F; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC4E2C340EB; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:18:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1644967118; bh=QeVPmQZzGvl7DCajPZBM5E4Qcbgt1kD5MfDXO75+qHk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=m8+AUeNcUDoZs97Qg40DOO5XchTZ4gs3/gyYht8NogHZqbIloXkURTiPVfO/wkjUU 3K6Es5VOMblyHHNilajuGmt8jsmRTOguJ16fZTqCgtPvDJQyiwKjHK4etM/4IOhnDn tQMgdl4TpQUzFNHM4rr71tmrptL6YParxXu4cGAqrQ0QeWgKkhrIGZtQfr3nRutGIh uxuKDivncOz/ZMMKTQF9TuJI3ABqpS0xGsVr1A86HJrp3rgTXNT8ZgYEkrjrOaZ0p5 oKW7EccrvKsOrrwLJ3ppVIM7sQg32LRqZMsL+tIsrevvgPe6+/P7QQkq3t9rylEYc3 uh0G3tYDDzvFA== From: Will Deacon To: Catalin Marinas , Andre Przywara Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: booting.rst: Clarify EL2 and cover v8-R64 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:18:20 +0000 Message-Id: <164493738020.3934087.8555074967425195921.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20220107160056.322141-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <20220107160056.322141-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220215_151841_836123_202B2D21 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.00 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 16:00:54 +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > clarify the wording of the ARM64 boot protocol requirements, to both > cater for the introduction of secure EL2 in Armv8.4, but also for the > addition of the Armv8-R64 architecture branch. > There is an ARM ARM supplement for v8-R64[1], and also a free model[2]. > > On top of those clarifications, there are at least two other issues to > consider for v8-R64 on Linux, I wonder if those should be documented > somewhere, although I doubt that booting.rst is the right place: > - Linux clears the NS/NSTable bit in the PTEs. In non-secure world those > bits are ignored, but when in secure world this means "secure PA". > That luckily matches the design here (secure-only), but we should avoid > re-purposing those bits in the future (which would be technically > possible when running only non-secure). > - The GIC needs to be implemented using a "single Security state" for > the Linux GIC driver to work. The model mentioned above defaults to > a security aware GIC, so needs to be told off using the command line. > I wonder if this is should be explicitly mentioned somewhere, to avoid > disappointment by implementors later. > > [...] Applied first patch to arm64 (for-next/docs), thanks! [1/2] arm64: booting.rst: Clarify on requiring non-secure EL2 https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/b8ac4ee08d48 Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel