From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] netcp: fix regression in receive processing
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:18:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1651314.QiL8XMyoqS@wuerfel> (raw)
A cleanup patch I did was unfortunately wrong and introduced
multiple serious bugs in the netcp rx processing, as indicated
by these correct gcc warnings:
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c:776:14: warning: 'buf_ptr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c:687:14: warning: 'ptr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
I have checked the patch once more and found that a call to
get_pkt_info() accidentally got removed in netcp_free_rx_desc_chain,
and netcp_process_one_rx_packet no longer retrieved the correct
buffer length. This patch should fix all the known problems,
but I did not test on real hardware.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 899077791403 ("netcp: try to reduce type confusion in descriptors")
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c
index 92d08eb262c2..c61d66d38634 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/netcp_core.c
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ static void netcp_free_rx_desc_chain(struct netcp_intf *netcp,
unsigned int buf_len, dma_sz = sizeof(*ndesc);
void *buf_ptr;
u32 pad[2];
+ u32 tmp;
get_words(&dma_desc, 1, &desc->next_desc);
@@ -591,6 +592,7 @@ static void netcp_free_rx_desc_chain(struct netcp_intf *netcp,
dev_err(netcp->ndev_dev, "failed to unmap Rx desc\n");
break;
}
+ get_pkt_info(&dma_buf, &tmp, &dma_desc, ndesc);
get_pad_ptr(&buf_ptr, ndesc);
dma_unmap_page(netcp->dev, dma_buf, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
__free_page(buf_ptr);
@@ -637,6 +639,7 @@ static int netcp_process_one_rx_packet(struct netcp_intf *netcp)
dma_addr_t dma_desc, dma_buff;
struct netcp_packet p_info;
struct sk_buff *skb;
+ u32 pad[2];
void *org_buf_ptr;
dma_desc = knav_queue_pop(netcp->rx_queue, &dma_sz);
@@ -650,7 +653,8 @@ static int netcp_process_one_rx_packet(struct netcp_intf *netcp)
}
get_pkt_info(&dma_buff, &buf_len, &dma_desc, desc);
- get_pad_ptr(&org_buf_ptr, desc);
+ get_pad_info(&pad[0], &pad[1], &org_buf_len, desc);
+ org_buf_ptr = (void *)(uintptr_t)(pad[0] + ((u64)pad[1] << 32));
if (unlikely(!org_buf_ptr)) {
dev_err(netcp->ndev_dev, "NULL bufptr in desc\n");
@@ -684,7 +688,7 @@ static int netcp_process_one_rx_packet(struct netcp_intf *netcp)
}
get_pkt_info(&dma_buff, &buf_len, &dma_desc, ndesc);
- get_pad_ptr(ptr, ndesc);
+ get_pad_ptr(&ptr, ndesc);
page = ptr;
if (likely(dma_buff && buf_len && page)) {
@@ -773,7 +777,7 @@ static void netcp_free_rx_buf(struct netcp_intf *netcp, int fdq)
}
get_org_pkt_info(&dma, &buf_len, desc);
- get_pad_ptr(buf_ptr, desc);
+ get_pad_ptr(&buf_ptr, desc);
if (unlikely(!dma)) {
dev_err(netcp->ndev_dev, "NULL orig_buff in desc\n");
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-18 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-18 14:18 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-12-19 5:10 ` [PATCH] netcp: fix regression in receive processing David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1651314.QiL8XMyoqS@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox