From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02DCC433EF for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 14:52:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lDUwn7NQjlZ+Wbpe8DxxWW9tnSIzqua+P6W/KY+IAZc=; b=BYBgTYvL9fxJpU Ls6k5IcrpsR7fEVv8+B6B75QKP56OsxZL7Gtq9ISZYJo176Br8icmBO63vEw+fRmj96UpuSKmzij/ o4hfR6cYHxGzJEYeCHwBsnxBKk0ZK+rYUNqUN3zQZhblQvdEbG2nNt9X8sUskRwUfgQh7NRqX67H0 IpnNIwlMLbLc50j7SmrjA7LCzVmIUkTJAhKWyiG/KIIeFUHmDXbElpryeGTsyxs+U9+w03TpRRPzm cDA07VrIYS2axFnFv3ml2ol3qF5ll+njmLusQP4laczQorJCQbQyUfo91QReWq0dgXNhislfsoYaN XraTte5oQwAUvSw2qUXQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyE4y-001bPP-LC; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 14:51:40 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyE4t-001bOG-6V; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 14:51:37 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364D11480; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D0063F73B; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:51:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , Jeffy Chen , Etienne Carriere , Heiko Stuebner , Nicolas Frattaroli , Liang Chen , Kever Yang , Peter Geis Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:51:06 +0100 Message-Id: <165452690983.3957918.16899232286285510282.b4-ty@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220523171559.472112-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20220523171559.472112-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220606_075135_322595_63B14ADF X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.85 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:15:59 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Even though malformed replies from firmware must be treated carefully to > avoid memory corruption Kernel side, some out-of-spec SCMI replies can > be tolerated to avoid breaking existing deployed system, as long as they > won't cause memory issues. > Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks! [1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/122839b58a -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel