From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:03:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] spi: s3c64xx: Add missing compatibles In-Reply-To: <20130923135042.GH21013@sirena.org.uk> References: <1379929545-27517-1-git-send-email-m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com> <20130923135042.GH21013@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <1668307.AS5AU6asQx@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On Monday 23 of September 2013 14:50:42 Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:45:45AM +0200, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: > > Add compatibles for s3c6410, s5pc100 and s5pc110/s5pv210 boards. > > > static const struct of_device_id s3c64xx_spi_dt_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "samsung,s3c2443-spi", > > + .data = (void *)&s3c2443_spi_port_config, > > + }, > > + { .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-spi", > > + .data = (void *)&s3c6410_spi_port_config, > > + }, > > This is missing s3c6400 and at least one other s3c24xx I think. They > can be added later though so applied, thanks. I think after this patch the table lists all the SoC variants supported by the driver, at least it's what I can tell from a quick look at s3c64xx_spi_driver_ids[] array. The compatible for S3C64xx should be probably called "samsung,s3c6400", though, as it's the first SoC with this variant. Best regards, Tomasz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: