From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:05:25 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v3.4-rc6 In-Reply-To: References: <20120507223632.GP5088@atomide.com> Message-ID: <1673508.aX9Ao89479@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On Tuesday 08 May 2012 23:48:06 Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > The following changes since commit 69964ea4c7b68c9399f7977aa5b9aa6539a6a98a: > [..] > > > Enrico Butera (1): > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: fix smsc911x dummy regulator id > > Hmm. Picking 40 without any kind of comment in the code isn't doing > any favors for future readers. Seems like 1 would be free on this > board, from the rest of the board file to judge (one other > reg-fixed-regulator platform device)? > > Please either comment why you picked 40 (i.e. it's a random number), > or change it to something a little less random like 1. :) > > > Laurent Pinchart (1): > > ARM: OMAP: igep0020: Specify the VPLL2 regulator unconditionally > > Is this a regression? I don't see any recent changes regarding this, > so it's hard to tell. If not then I'd rather hold off for the merge > window given that we're at -rc6. It's not a regression, I'm fine with holding off until the v3.5 merge window. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart