* [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable
@ 2017-10-04 18:56 Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve handling of protocol and firmware version subfields Heiner Kallweit
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2017-10-04 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Making the header subfields members of struct dvfs_info allows to make
the code better readable and avoids some macro magic.
In addition remove a useless statement using info->latency.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index f713a64c..412f1c4c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@
#define MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS 8
#define MAX_DVFS_OPPS 16
-#define DVFS_LATENCY(hdr) (le32_to_cpu(hdr) >> 16)
-#define DVFS_OPP_COUNT(hdr) ((le32_to_cpu(hdr) >> 8) & 0xff)
#define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS 16
#define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_MASK ((1U << PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS) - 1)
@@ -328,7 +326,9 @@ struct legacy_clk_set_value {
} __packed;
struct dvfs_info {
- __le32 header;
+ u8 domain;
+ u8 opp_count;
+ __le16 latency;
struct {
__le32 freq;
__le32 m_volt;
@@ -667,8 +667,8 @@ static int scpi_dvfs_populate_info(struct device *dev, u8 domain)
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
- info->count = DVFS_OPP_COUNT(buf.header);
- info->latency = DVFS_LATENCY(buf.header) * 1000; /* uS to nS */
+ info->count = buf.opp_count;
+ info->latency = le16_to_cpu(buf.latency) * 1000; /* uS to nS */
info->opps = devm_kcalloc(dev, info->count, sizeof(*opp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info->opps)
@@ -721,9 +721,6 @@ static int scpi_dvfs_get_transition_latency(struct device *dev)
if (IS_ERR(info))
return PTR_ERR(info);
- if (!info->latency)
- return 0;
-
return info->latency;
}
--
2.14.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve handling of protocol and firmware version subfields
2017-10-04 18:56 [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Heiner Kallweit
@ 2017-10-04 19:00 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct sensor_value Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-05 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2017-10-04 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
By using FIELD_GET and proper masks we can avoid quite some shifting
and masking macro magic and make the code better readable.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index 412f1c4c..d305b926 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
@@ -73,18 +74,12 @@
#define MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS 8
#define MAX_DVFS_OPPS 16
-#define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS 16
-#define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_MASK ((1U << PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS) - 1)
-#define PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(x) ((x) >> PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS)
-#define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(x) ((x) & PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_MASK)
+#define PROTO_REV_MAJOR_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define PROTO_REV_MINOR_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
-#define FW_REV_MAJOR_BITS 24
-#define FW_REV_MINOR_BITS 16
-#define FW_REV_PATCH_MASK ((1U << FW_REV_MINOR_BITS) - 1)
-#define FW_REV_MINOR_MASK ((1U << FW_REV_MAJOR_BITS) - 1)
-#define FW_REV_MAJOR(x) ((x) >> FW_REV_MAJOR_BITS)
-#define FW_REV_MINOR(x) (((x) & FW_REV_MINOR_MASK) >> FW_REV_MINOR_BITS)
-#define FW_REV_PATCH(x) ((x) & FW_REV_PATCH_MASK)
+#define FW_REV_MAJOR_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
+#define FW_REV_MINOR_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
+#define FW_REV_PATCH_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
#define MAX_RX_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(30))
@@ -867,19 +862,19 @@ static int scpi_init_versions(struct scpi_drvinfo *info)
static ssize_t protocol_version_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- return sprintf(buf, "%d.%d\n",
- PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(scpi_info->protocol_version),
- PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(scpi_info->protocol_version));
+ return sprintf(buf, "%lu.%lu\n",
+ FIELD_GET(PROTO_REV_MAJOR_MASK, scpi_info->protocol_version),
+ FIELD_GET(PROTO_REV_MINOR_MASK, scpi_info->protocol_version));
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(protocol_version);
static ssize_t firmware_version_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- return sprintf(buf, "%d.%d.%d\n",
- FW_REV_MAJOR(scpi_info->firmware_version),
- FW_REV_MINOR(scpi_info->firmware_version),
- FW_REV_PATCH(scpi_info->firmware_version));
+ return sprintf(buf, "%lu.%lu.%lu\n",
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_MAJOR_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version),
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_MINOR_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version),
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_PATCH_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version));
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(firmware_version);
@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ static int scpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
scpi_dvfs_populate(dev);
- _dev_info(dev, "SCP Protocol %d.%d Firmware %d.%d.%d version\n",
- PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(scpi_info->protocol_version),
- PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(scpi_info->protocol_version),
- FW_REV_MAJOR(scpi_info->firmware_version),
- FW_REV_MINOR(scpi_info->firmware_version),
- FW_REV_PATCH(scpi_info->firmware_version));
+ _dev_info(dev, "SCP Protocol %lu.%lu Firmware %lu.%lu.%lu version\n",
+ FIELD_GET(PROTO_REV_MAJOR_MASK, scpi_info->protocol_version),
+ FIELD_GET(PROTO_REV_MINOR_MASK, scpi_info->protocol_version),
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_MAJOR_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version),
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_MINOR_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version),
+ FIELD_GET(FW_REV_PATCH_MASK, scpi_info->firmware_version));
ret = devm_device_add_groups(dev, versions_groups);
if (ret)
--
2.14.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct sensor_value
2017-10-04 18:56 [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve handling of protocol and firmware version subfields Heiner Kallweit
@ 2017-10-04 19:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-05 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2017-10-04 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
lo_val and hi_val together in this order are a little endian 64 bit value.
Therefore we can simplify struct sensor_value and the code by defining
it as a __le64 value and by using le64_to_cpu.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index d305b926..c923d1eb 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -347,9 +347,8 @@ struct _scpi_sensor_info {
};
struct sensor_value {
- __le32 lo_val;
- __le32 hi_val;
-} __packed;
+ __le64 val;
+};
struct dev_pstate_set {
__le16 dev_id;
@@ -785,11 +784,10 @@ static int scpi_sensor_get_value(u16 sensor, u64 *val)
return ret;
if (scpi_info->is_legacy)
- /* only 32-bits supported, hi_val can be junk */
- *val = le32_to_cpu(buf.lo_val);
+ /* only 32-bits supported, upper 32 bits can be junk */
+ *val = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)&buf.val);
else
- *val = (u64)le32_to_cpu(buf.hi_val) << 32 |
- le32_to_cpu(buf.lo_val);
+ *val = le64_to_cpu(buf.val);
return 0;
}
--
2.14.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable
2017-10-04 18:56 [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve handling of protocol and firmware version subfields Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct sensor_value Heiner Kallweit
@ 2017-10-05 11:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2017-10-05 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 04/10/17 19:56, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Making the header subfields members of struct dvfs_info allows to make
> the code better readable and avoids some macro magic.
>
> In addition remove a useless statement using info->latency.
>
All 3 looks trivial and applied now. Thanks for the cleanup.
I found couple of other trivial things that can be cleaned. I will CC
you on them, it would be good if you can review and/or test.
I need to send PR by end of this week or early next week.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-05 11:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-04 18:56 [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve handling of protocol and firmware version subfields Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-04 19:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct sensor_value Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-05 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: improve struct dvfs_info to make code better readable Sudeep Holla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).