From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:05:57 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common
 clock framework
In-Reply-To: <20130322142739.834.2721@quantum>
References: <1361175686-19400-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
 <20130319184938.8663.18115@quantum> <201303192212.16877.heiko@sntech.de>
 <20130319215038.8663.83548@quantum>
 <116a01ce24fd$e32658b0$a9730a10$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20130320025656.11073.90469@quantum>
 <11af01ce2526$63b0a8f0$2b11fad0$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20130320144000.11073.37741@quantum>
 <14d801ce268b$80a8d160$81fa7420$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20130322142739.834.2721@quantum>
Message-ID: <16dd01ce28f4$e8256860$b8703920$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Mike Turquette wrote:

[...]

> > Yeah, I know. So if you want to add your ack on drivers/clk stuff for
> this series in samsung tree, please let me know.
> >
> 
> The patches are in pretty good shape.  Please add my ack if you are able

OK, I will.

> to rebase comfortably.  But if rebasing causes you and your downstream
> users a lot of pain then don't do it.
> 
Yes it can be, but it can be handled easily because of no-changing codes.

Note, please check Heiko's follow-up clk/samsung patches.
<http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/16817>

I'm fine on that and if you're ok, I'd like to take that with this series.

Thanks.

- Kukjin