From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:24:54 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes-1 for v3.12 In-Reply-To: References: <525B1722.5060001@samsung.com> Message-ID: <16f101cec873$ce47a880$6ad6f980$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Alexander Shiyan (1): > > ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix switching FIFO in arch_enable_uart_fifo function > > What's the regression that this is fixing? As far as I can tell, the > code has been the same since 2008. Or did something surrounding it > change? > Yeah, you're right. Actually I has queued it into non-critical before but missed to sent out. OK, I agree with you and let me sort out again. > > > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (1): > > ARM: dts: fix PL330 MDMA1 address in DT for Universal C210 board > > > > Jingoo Han (1): > > ARM: dts: Remove DP PHY node from exynos5250.dtsi > > You are sending this in pretty late. Please be careful about conflicts > due to this late revert, in particular if you plan on re-introducing > something in 3.13. > As you know, unfortunately, DP PHY node change applied in DTS without changing driver in 3.12 so current 3.12 kernel cannot support it. I want 3.12 kernel to support it properly and yes, I have a plan to re-introduce DP PHY node in 3.13. BTW if you have objection, maybe I will send it to stable 3.12 instead... > > Tomasz Figa (1): > > ARM: dts: Work around lack of cpufreq regulator lookup for > > exynos4210-origen and trats boards > > > > Youngmin Nam (1): > > ARM: dts: Fix a typo on Exynos5440 DTS files > > This is a bad patch subject, it can be way more specific. Also, this > is a good reason not to have these elaborate bootargs in the DTS, in > particular for modern platforms -- the bootargs should come from > firmware for your platform. > Agreed. The subject should be clear...Anyway current bootargs in DTS is wrong so I think, it should be fixed, I agree with you about bootargs though. Thanks, Kukjin