From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:38:04 +0200
Subject: [RFC 1/2] PM / suspend: Add platform_suspend_target_state()
In-Reply-To: <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr>
References: <20170622085102.mpk7vxodpgxtrlfd@piout.net>
 <1578637.1XJQpJurXn@aspire.rjw.lan>
 <53f90d62-111f-57ae-907d-aa347b7033e0@free.fr>
Message-ID: <1703157.S2GHVxrQk4@aspire.rjw.lan>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sunday, July 16, 2017 01:34:53 AM Mason wrote:
> On 16/07/2017 01:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:20:27 AM Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> >> The enum offers the advantage of centralizing how many different states
> >> exist for all the platforms we know about in the kernel, it's easy to
> >> define common values for platforms that have the same semantics, just
> >> like it's simple to add new values for platform specific details.
> > 
> > Well, you seem to be liking this, so why don't you just implement it?
> 
> At the end of his message, Florian wrote:
> 
> > In any case, just agree and I will be happy to follow-up with patches.

But it may be hard to convince everybody without posting code changes
and often enough showing a patch makes a good argument.

Thanks,
Rafael