From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Generic IOMMU page table framework
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:33:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1703241.O5cxT4doxg@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141215161052.GM20738@arm.com>
Hi Will,
On Monday 15 December 2014 16:10:52 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:49:30PM +0000, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 11:51:14 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > This series introduces a generic IOMMU page table allocation framework,
> > > implements support for ARM long-descriptors and then ports the arm-smmu
> > > driver over to the new code.
>
> [...]
>
> > > All feedback welcome.
> >
> > I've successfully tested the patch set with the Renesas IPMMU-VMSA driver
> > with the following extension to the allocator.
> >
> > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Wahey, that's really cool, thanks! I have a few minor comments on your patch
> below. If you don't object, then I can make them locally and include your
> patch on top of my v2 series?
Sure. Please see my reply below.
> > From 4bebb7f3a5a48541d4c89ce7c61e6ff66686c3a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:34:50 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] iommu: io-pgtable-arm: Add Non-Secure quirk
> >
> > The quirk causes the Non-Secure bit to be set in all page table entries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c index 669e322a83a4..b6910e142734 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > @@ -80,11 +80,13 @@
> >
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_TYPE_TABLE 3
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_TYPE_PAGE 3
> > +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_NSTABLE (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 63)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_XN (((arm_lpae_iopte)3) << 53)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AF (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 10)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_SH_NS (((arm_lpae_iopte)0) << 8)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_SH_OS (((arm_lpae_iopte)2) << 8)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_SH_IS (((arm_lpae_iopte)3) << 8)
> > +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_NS (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 5)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_VALID (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 0)
> > #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTR_LO_MASK (((arm_lpae_iopte)0x3ff) << 2)
> >
> > @@ -201,6 +203,9 @@ static int arm_lpae_init_pte(struct
> > arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,>
> > if (iopte_leaf(*ptep, lvl))
> > return -EEXIST;
> >
> > + if (data->iop.cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_SECURE)
> > + pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_NS;
> > +
> > if (lvl == ARM_LPAE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)
> > pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_TYPE_PAGE;
> > else
> > @@ -244,6 +249,8 @@ static int __arm_lpae_map(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable
> > *data, unsigned long iova,>
> > data->iop.cfg.tlb->flush_pgtable(cptep, 1UL << data->pg_shift,
> > cookie);
> > pte = __pa(cptep) | ARM_LPAE_PTE_TYPE_TABLE;
> > + if (data->iop.cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_SECURE)
> > + pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_NSTABLE;
> > *ptep = pte;
> > data->iop.cfg.tlb->flush_pgtable(ptep, sizeof(*ptep), cookie);
> > } else {
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
> > index c1cff3d045db..a41a15d30596 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct iommu_gather_ops {
> > void (*flush_pgtable)(void *ptr, size_t size, void *cookie);
> > };
> >
> > +/* Set the Non-Secure bit in the PTEs */
> > +#define IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_SECURE (1 << 0)
>
> I think I'd stick an _ARM_ somewhere in here, so maybe
> IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS?
I'm fine with that.
By the way, I'm only familiar with the Renesas implementation of the VMSA
IOMMU, could you double-check whether setting the NSTABLE and NS bits on all
levels make sense to you ? It seems to be required by my hardware, even though
the ARM spec mentions that setting the NSTABLE bit causes non-secure accesses
to page tables for all lower levels regardless of their NSTABLE/NS bits.
> > +
> >
> > struct io_pgtable_cfg {
>
> and I'd put the #define here, next to the member.
They're right before the structure so I don't think they're too far away, but
if you prefer that coding style that's fine with me.
> > int quirks; /* IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_* */
> > unsigned long pgsize_bitmap;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-15 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 11:51 [PATCH 0/4] Generic IOMMU page table framework Will Deacon
2014-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu: introduce generic page table allocation framework Will Deacon
2014-11-30 22:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-01 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-01 13:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-01 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-14 23:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-15 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu: add ARM LPAE page table allocator Will Deacon
2014-11-30 23:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-01 17:23 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-01 20:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-02 9:41 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-02 11:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-05 18:48 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-02 22:41 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2014-12-03 11:11 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-05 10:55 ` Varun Sethi
2014-12-05 18:48 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-14 17:45 ` Varun Sethi
2014-12-15 13:30 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-15 15:43 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-15 16:35 ` Varun Sethi
2014-12-15 17:25 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-15 16:43 ` Varun Sethi
2014-12-15 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu: add self-consistency tests to ARM LPAE IO " Will Deacon
2014-11-27 11:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu: make use of generic LPAE allocator Will Deacon
2014-11-30 22:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] Generic IOMMU page table framework Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-01 12:05 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-02 13:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-02 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-02 22:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-14 23:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-15 16:10 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-15 17:33 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-12-15 17:39 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-15 17:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1703241.O5cxT4doxg@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).