From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDFEC43381 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B48206C0 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="bf4QuGpZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 68B48206C0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=6aj5WGsq8iHFb8q0Tjrq8vlI0hmKrLb0UQngOjzWzco=; b=bf4QuGpZVlIvDH Wj+RsAwuNeTcL9TWGlniLZv4PUE+RlOJOzoooqbVCfG6uHezQfG8UPkaERAVtB+mU/I6XzSt5TcrH G9Kw37EgdnvK6RzkJ+Z02UfQedCm4QT/fr6BCZwl1zuNVltnhCG5THbLVgIxAsRXLZ80NoGCwPIMU vOLvx6Xl1TDYRKntUTCwB/whFyIsa/v5xLzddVBFlx2fr2Atl4KbvpwT0gnUK6jAsmmU5MBCbUzmo kASY0Ld14ZE7QlMpP6XuOLMdY16AGzoVAy7CFABjXAH6OrjSq/EOIHWAYn1zIOrbkap7M1uknr33p fX0UgCGGuxU/h1CZ80oQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1guiNC-0000bk-Iy; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:38:06 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1guiN8-0000bF-R8; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:38:04 +0000 Received: from ip5f5a6320.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.99.32] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guiN6-0002bN-6r; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:38:00 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/2] Rockchip arm64 devicetree fixes for 5.0 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:37:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1707879.5psMmg8Cs2@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <7484850.KS8GUYnfXV@phil> <23121360.LiWTZRSn6P@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190215_103803_029516_8F7D23E9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" , arm-soc , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019, 13:42:48 CET schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fix for new dtc graph warnings and a regulator fix for rock64. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Dmitry Voytik (1): > > arm64: dts: rockchip: enable usb-host regulators at boot on > > rk3328-rock64 > > Pulled into arm/fixes, thanks! > > Note: since we always have only a single fixes branch, sending the > 32-bit and 64-bit fixes together would be slightly easier. No problem, I'll keep 32+64bit fixes together in the future. I guess regular changes for the merge-window should continue being separated, right? Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel