From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: fsl: fsl,rcpm: fix unevaluated fsl,rcpm-wakeup property
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:07:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172350046483.2314917.7547438885110898301.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240811153507.126512-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 17:35:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Drop the RCPM consumer example from the binding (LPUART device node),
> because:
> 1. Using phandles is typical syntax, thus explaining it is not needed in
> the provider binding,
> 2. It has 'fsl,rcpm-wakeup' property which is not allowed by LPUART
> binding so it causes dt_binding_check warning:
>
> fsl,rcpm.example.dtb: serial@2950000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('fsl,rcpm-wakeup' was unexpected)
> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml#
>
> Alternatively, this property could be added to LPUART binding
> (fsl-lpuart.yaml), but it looks like none of in-tree DTS use it.
>
> Fixes: ad21e3840a88 ("dt-bindings: soc: fsl: Convert rcpm to yaml format")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/fsl,rcpm.yaml | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-11 15:35 [PATCH] dt-bindings: fsl: fsl,rcpm: fix unevaluated fsl,rcpm-wakeup property Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-11 17:09 ` Frank Li
2024-08-12 16:07 ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-12 22:07 ` Rob Herring (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172350046483.2314917.7547438885110898301.robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox