From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:59:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 00/12] CCF support for Renesas r7s72100 In-Reply-To: <20140307164741.GJ28943@katana> References: <1394208048-32495-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1552759.qGZNIXqrb1@avalon> <20140307164741.GJ28943@katana> Message-ID: <1725290.WIBK8uYmkH@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 07 March 2014 17:47:41 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > That would have saved only 2 lines since we need the workaround anyhow > > > (MTU2) and would break the incremental approach of this series somewhat. > > > I'd like to keep it. > > > > It would have saved one patch. If Simon needs to apply CCF support > > separately I'm fine with that approach, but if both changes are applied > > at the same time the SCIF patches could go in first. > > Which one would be saved? We need to workaround anyhow (patch 5) and > some scif cleanup besides the workaround is needed, too (patch 7). No? Indeed, I got it wrong. We can leave it as-is then. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: