From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:37:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] serial: digicolor: fix sysrq handling Message-ID: <1730002.vWGOEymGdz@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Trying to build the digicolor-usart driver when sysrq is disabled results in a compile error: drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c: In function 'digicolor_uart_console_write': drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c:407:33: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member named 'sysrq' Like a lot of other drivers, this one requires an #ifdef to avoid accessing the sysrq field here. While looking into this, I noticed that the case where sysrq support is enabled is also broken, because the driver fails to set the SUPPORT_SYSRQ macro. This patch hopefully fixes both, but I do not hardware to test if sysrq is actually working now. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c index 09ce0b3764e2..1e4bdd895804 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ #include #include +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CONEXANT_DIGICOLOR_CONSOLE) && defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) +#define SUPPORT_SYSRQ +#endif + #define UA_ENABLE 0x00 #define UA_ENABLE_ENABLE BIT(0) @@ -403,10 +407,11 @@ static void digicolor_uart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *c, u8 status; unsigned long flags; int locked = 1; - +#ifdef SUPPORT_SYSRQ if (port->sysrq || oops_in_progress) locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); else +#endif spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); uart_console_write(port, c, n, digicolor_uart_console_putchar);