From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:17:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix support of Exynos4210 rev0 SoC In-Reply-To: <20130428192231.GB22332@quad.lixom.net> References: <1366731994-7478-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1366731994-7478-12-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <20130428192231.GB22332@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <1736061.BDRHr9MsyY@flatron> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sunday 28 of April 2013 12:22:31 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:46:32PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210 > > rev0 SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs > > different clocksource initialization. > > > > This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function as init_time > > callback for all Exynos-based boards, including Universal_C210, which > > originally had to use samsung_timer_init(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > I didn't apply this one since I had massive conflicts caused by it. Can > you please resubmit on top of late/fixes? As we discussed on IRC, since this patch has multiple dependencies, let's wait until everything settles and apply it then, as an rc fix to avoid further merge conflicts. Best regards, Tomasz