linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:52:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1744325.yNd0r8SV4R@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433517104-7595-2-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>

Hi Caesar,

Am Freitag, 5. Juni 2015, 23:11:42 schrieb Caesar Wang:
> We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core
> off.  In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off.
> In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset.
> 
> In general, the correct flow is:
> 
> CPU off:
>     reset_control_assert
>     regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd))
> CPU on:
>     regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0)
>     reset_control_deassert
> 
> This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per:
>     cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/
>     for i in $(seq 1000); do
>         echo "================= $i ============"
>         for j in $(seq 100); do
>             while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat
> cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online
>                 echo 0 > cpu2/online
>                 echo 0 > cpu3/online
>             done
>             while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat
> cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online
>                 echo 1 > cpu2/online
>                 echo 1 > cpu3/online
>             done
>         done
>     done
> 
> The following is reproducile log:
>     [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs
>     [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>     [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown
>     [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown
>     [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP
> on cpu 0 .......
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
> ---

could we do this something like the shown below instead?
Here the deassertion of the reset really happens after we are sure the
power-domain is on


-------------- 8< ---------------
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
index 5b4ca3c..ee5dbad6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static struct reset_control *rockchip_get_core_reset(int cpu)
 static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
 {
 	u32 val = (on) ? 0 : BIT(pd);
+	struct reset_control *rstc = rockchip_get_core_reset(pd);
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -80,20 +81,16 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
 	 * processor is powered down.
 	 */
 	if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
-		struct reset_control *rstc = rockchip_get_core_reset(pd);
-
+		/* We only require the reset on the RK3288@the moment */
 		if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
 			pr_err("%s: could not get reset control for core %d\n",
 			       __func__, pd);
 			return PTR_ERR(rstc);
 		}
 
-		if (on)
-			reset_control_deassert(rstc);
-		else
+		if (!on)
 			reset_control_assert(rstc);
 
-		reset_control_put(rstc);
 	}
 
 	ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val);
@@ -112,6 +109,12 @@ static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 && on)
+			reset_control_deassert(rstc);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(rstc))
+		reset_control_put(rstc);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-------------- 8< ---------------

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 15:11 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 15:52   ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2015-06-05 16:17     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-05 16:28   ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-05 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: rockchip: ensure CPU to enter WFI/WFE state Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:49   ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-05 18:29     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-05 20:24       ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-08  4:56         ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-08 20:52           ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-05 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP code style Caesar Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1744325.yNd0r8SV4R@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).