From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:32:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clockevent: exynos_mct: fix lockdep warning In-Reply-To: <5243823D.4040208@linaro.org> References: <1380120578-17458-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <5243823D.4040208@linaro.org> Message-ID: <17472486.7GQJa9ux9F@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Daniel, On Thursday 26 of September 2013 02:39:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 09/25/2013 04:49 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > > This patch moves request_irq() out of cpu notifier callback > > to fix below lockdep warning: > > > > [ 0.249513] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 0.249525] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/lockdep.c:2740 lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c() > > [ 0.249534] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) > > [ 0.249538] Modules linked in: > > [ 0.249548] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-next-20130923+ #338 > > [ 0.249564] [] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) > > [ 0.249577] [] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) from [] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4) > > [ 0.249591] [] (dump_stack+0x74/0xb4) from [] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c) > > [ 0.249604] [] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x9c) from [] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) > > [ 0.249615] [] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [] (lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c) > > [ 0.249626] [] (lockdep_trace_alloc+0xc8/0x10c) from [] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x38/0x2 > > 24) > > [ 0.249638] [] (kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x38/0x224) from [] (request_threaded_irq+0x90/0x130) > > [ 0.249651] [] (request_threaded_irq+0x90/0x130) from [] (exynos4_local_timer_setup+0xdc/0x140) > > [ 0.249663] [] (exynos4_local_timer_setup+0xdc/0x140) from [] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify+0x40/0xb0) > > [ 0.249675] [] (exynos4_mct_cpu_notify+0x40/0xb0) from [] (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x78) > > [ 0.249688] [] (notifier_call_chain+0x48/0x78) from [] (__raw_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x2c) > > [ 0.249700] [] (__raw_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x2c) from [] (__cpu_notify+0x3c/0x58) > > [ 0.249713] [] (__cpu_notify+0x3c/0x58) from [] (cpu_notify+0x20/0x24) > > [ 0.249725] [] (cpu_notify+0x20/0x24) from [] (notify_cpu_starting+0x58/0x60) > > [ 0.249737] [] (notify_cpu_starting+0x58/0x60) from [] (secondary_start_kernel+0xec/0x13 > > 8) > > [ 0.249748] [] (secondary_start_kernel+0xec/0x138) from [<40008664>] (0x40008664) > > [ 0.249767] ---[ end trace 3406ff24bd97382e ]--- > > > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > > Cc: Kukjin Kim > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > > --- > > Tomasz, what do you think ? This is a fix that we may want to have, but it must be modified to take my regression fix[1] into account. [1] clocksource: exynos_mct: Set IRQ affinity when the CPU goes online http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/22511/focus=23418 Best regards, Tomasz