From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697B2C83F17 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:35:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZlV9rLMS+m6cSWh+Dn0/WPmoMhwq987guplhp1MndGc=; b=QfRksEpnxTgwMWMmCmpYNDgdD0 nvVePoc6+JC7YngG1X8i+tMSldiuMoJu5ZvLaa/l4pIo0FFnhF1ahO3WnSz45bM1CfWsE3da4KeiI 7ObH3Enm0vK4AqQnDGfN4dv4Be0iOhEsxW7gTWGyxZRoBO32Lp4dKYiwP8Kz6URzVFywlNwse4SQl XwA+2ugB9EV0sOhuZFwlndZaIpAaTPgefs3RZgQS2lqJyaKn3O9B84k+nKkowNS7064xVAP4eomVS aVIvOQnrQwl69aNB5pEnnHGAikbOx2WrMLEgMwZbwehSw9NpPGncwabAqh+Bx/VgymoqGeAvCb/yc VK+TttUg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ueaZC-00000005DWR-1m6I; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:35:34 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ueZoJ-0000000567J-2fk2; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A93601D7; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35A99C4CEF1; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753278426; bh=Px8gBix96tpJXZzdaFnoa/DdcC+iaCFv0QakGJFoD4g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JwamNn4BoaqZcQV4LZoAtTCdgd5OPftSTu2rR5gNkOGdFAdazCFAgmaZfxl6+Jxv6 VYWmsNhSJtG56LNFRz3TCG/19X+dJk0aSwN3fr4jUFL0qqx+EhN1G/RYBBOrd11N1C DSJ9pSzZoseMtHdTzFGzgHo30nyO65+6UyPEpgaflDwHFyTlDcOpi9CcJjvNmajc+T 6JGc2OdvDG1Y/3Ma7536Ke6KLNXQuqXnkuRzfdeZbjFoE478L2gmCtdbGsEXcHNe1l xvRZECH4gaaf7SNbTi/RtIcpos463/CzivhfAikaRiaFauEP3Gma4JoKbwNGp/VJXz u1Qx2NtfDr0BQ== Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:47:05 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Jonas Karlman Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Yao Zi , Chukun Pan , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip: Allow use of a power-domain Message-ID: <175327842469.2144459.7995862129200440475.robh@kernel.org> References: <20250723085654.2273324-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <20250723085654.2273324-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250723085654.2273324-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:43 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > The GPIO controllers in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains > that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PMU. These always powered > on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree. > > Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there > has not been any real need to properly describe the GPIO controllers > power domain. > > On RK3528 the GPIO controllers are spread out among the described > PD_RKVENC, PD_VO and PD_VPU power domains. However, one GPIO controller > belong to an undescribed always powered on power domain. > > Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the GPIO > controllers in Rockchip SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman > --- > v2: Update commit message > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm)