From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0998BC83F1A for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=U11+qUDBFqdtzIwC9C/OC7CkSz8LcuQAkhGjD/qyD2I=; b=QUltaFohtFo3Bxtko6cKsbJXQi T2cOPxfpUH2vc1INp3gbzNkveUs2YLjOdw2rdGRalFk6sUcQzhpErkz/+9ngQYMLlsADouj4zdUV8 PrjfXJYEPwxig3sctBKL3s6lenthi2d5Bi7bfiPBPNzS1gB8V1J+jFPv6vuWa+E77PVatVDEfpjmR 10k65tfqWqp3H7ibHGw9z2Ti1g4UYkJSl8zzfXr7MHlox22FFPkya3uhtgsKUZKhni3CG26C1/k1l GKnwkQmJow/WuzNDJhQaOcEtDj7hFV+WCeDiPdno27YQ0XR918PWbxxdWZ+zSCv0EIAsJhghTFQFH G1ypmabQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ueae8-00000005ENw-0860; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:40:40 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ueZol-000000056Co-3xRG; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A16A5C62BA; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D21E6C4CEE7; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:47:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753278454; bh=e4iFmU4V8FdSQBveMXcP7eTilC+19QO83wN4KtTy+Ag=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eY8CsQHbcb2OswoT+ggFsv3c+SKfn4phee/f3jbk8YITne+7vWAvq+pKn+v41trYZ U6D+J+cibmnR0ZmBIszGLK9iU0OpXJuqBvH4y9Q0VJPGoQpOIA1zKDYP6ekqBERbDs QugPrw354rRa7o4rZZl7+YOJhT+wR0D2wY+tCaMLp17pDUPCumTsY7frUR4SUpOdAz NhMOBTZBPhuPXa/zUdu33rGWB/BYMSw6VLUkTST4KNKSZlc6m0gZ0Uw+jkHkOCiP7g QWHKnGcoWcxJf0LXcEpTS1HUvhCKP+60Sq3a93WUft148wYpbv3D1+0k5FGG+gd85N v9kXkk5W1rxuA== Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:47:34 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Jonas Karlman Cc: Yao Zi , Andy Shevchenko , Chukun Pan , Heiko Stuebner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jonathan Cameron , Conor Dooley , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, David Lechner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain Message-ID: <175327845184.2145175.4601554796265618767.robh@kernel.org> References: <20250723085654.2273324-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <20250723085654.2273324-4-jonas@kwiboo.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250723085654.2273324-4-jonas@kwiboo.se> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250723_064736_023979_03AF821C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:45 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > The SARADC controller in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains > that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PERI. These always powered > on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree. > > Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there > has not been any real need to properly describe the power domain of the > SARADC controller. > > On RK3528 the SARADC controller is part of the PD_VPU power domain. > > Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the SARADC > controller in Rockchip SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman > --- > v2: Update commit message > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm)